Infringement of public liberties: for Christian vigilance

While deconfinement is approaching and Edouard Philippe presented, on Tuesday April 28, the main axes of his government strategy, voices have been raised in the Catholic world to castigate the decision that had been taken, at first, to not not authorize the resumption of religious celebrations before June 2. The Prime Minister said on Monday May 4 that he was “ready to study” a resumption of worship on May 29 – just before the feast of Pentecost – arousing mixed reactions in the Muslim community, which will celebrate Eid of May 23 to 24.

→ LIVE. Coronavirus: the latest news in France and worldwide

In fact, the question of postponing the date for the resumption of religious celebrations deserved to be discussed, and it is understandable that the bishops – and many of the faithful! – regretted the initial arbitrations by the government, which gave the impression of not considering the spiritual dimension as an essential need. Was it legitimate to take advantage of this situation to take on the role of victims and denounce an “attack on freedom of worship”, even an “anti-Catholic tropism” of the President of the Republic?

Worrying measures

For us young Catholic laypeople from diverse backgrounds, such a posture was not, and cannot be constructive. It gives the image of a Church only capable of selective indignation, while the risks of social and ecological regression induced by the crisis already look gigantic. Among other reasons for concern, the measures that the executive is preparing to adopt to accelerate the systematization of mass digital tracing (via the StopCovid application) seem to us to be particularly worrying, because they directly threaten public liberties and accelerate the shift to a surveillance regime. This is at least the opinion of several groups of researchers and experts in computer science and cryptography, who highlighted the risks linked to the project in their forum “Warning against tracing projects” (, or on the dedicated site – but also that of magistrates, lawyers, and jurists who again shared their concerns on April 30 in a forum published on

It is here that we wish to challenge our co-religionists, and our bishops in particular: when will the Church be able to be a sign of contradiction, to announce to all that the risk of freedom is better than the comfort of security ? In fact, if Catholics have, in recent years, been passionate about bioethics, and more recently still for transhumanism, the serious attacks on public freedoms do not seem to have particularly moved them. In recent months, lawyer François Sureau, a former columnist at The cross, however, has repeatedly called upon public opinion to point out the liberticidal nature of the laws known as “anti-breakers” and “against online hatred” (which violate the right to demonstrate and freedom of expression respectively).

Towards a society of suspicion

Earlier, during the debates on anti-terrorism laws in 2017, the lawyer Mireille Delmas-Marty had already noted that the security concept that was gaining ground every day led us from a society of responsibility to a society of suspicion – and that this progressive abandonment of the principle of freedom by tacit submission to a power (that of the State and the GAFAM) constituted a “major anthropological rupture”. The recent documentary All under surveillance, 7 billion suspects, broadcast on April 22 on Arte, moreover showed that this one, far from having materialized only in China, begins to be tested on the national territory – as in Nice, where drones and devices of facial recognition are now used by the police.

It seems inconceivable to us today to remain indifferent to this general dynamic, which dangerously tightens the meshes of control over bodies and minds: on the contrary, it should arouse our citizen vigilance, and be the subject of real reflection. ethical and political, informed by our faith. In biblical tradition, all census projects led by kings who believe themselves to be all-powerful are doomed to failure – like David (2 Samuel 24) or Herod (Matthew 2, 16-17). The conciliar texts, which crystallize the tradition of the Church, remind us that it is required “that the exercise of the authority of public powers be legally delimited, so that the field of an honorable freedom, whether s ‘acts of persons or associations, is not too narrowly circumscribed’ (Preamble, Dignitatis Humanae).

Exit self-referentiality

“What world do we want?” – this is the question that the bishops have tirelessly asked during the debates on bioethics in recent years. Isn’t it time to transpose this question to the growing place of population control techniques, which is done to the detriment of public freedoms? During WYD in Krakow in 2016, Pope Francis strongly encouraged us to “swap the sofa for a pair of walking shoes”, in order to get out of self-referentiality and confront us with the real challenges of this century. Let us have the courage today to face the facts: accepting that a world crisscrossed by the technologies of fear is organized is incompatible with the call to an evangelical life and with our desire to serve the common good.

(1) Pierre-Louis Choquet – Researcher in social sciences, Joseph D’halluin – Association activist, Anne Waeles – Associate doctoral student in philosophy, Benoît Sibille – Associate doctoral student in philosophy, Victor Macé de Lépinay – Radio producer, Anouchka Vié – Lawyer, Jean-Victor Elie – Philosophy student, Arthur de Lassus – Engineer and market gardener, Anne Guillard – Doctoral student in theology, Paul Piccarreta – Journalist and editor, Valentine Rinner – Engineer and student in theology, Martin Monti-Lalaubie – Journalist, Thomas de Brugière – Committed to the Christian community, Thérèse du Sartel – Philosophy student, Baptiste Protais – Philosophy student, Pierre Bucher – Engineer and theology student, Louise Dumont Saint Priest – Lawyer, Gaëlle Toulemonde – Associate history teacher, Jérôme de Mercey – Lawyer, Pierre-Henri Bernard – Associate teacher of German, Inès Gandon – Employee in the social and solidarity economy.


Science, the doubts of an amputee ministry | Science

Spanish science has been in a crisis that seems to have no end for more than a decade. The public investigation system has lost more than 20,000 million euros since 2009. Although the economic recovery came years ago, laboratories have barely felt the improvements. Public investment in science is stagnant at levels similar to those of 2012, largely due to political instability and the inability to approve new budgets.

Among all this darkness, the scientific community saw one of its historical claims fulfilled in the summer of 2018 with the appointment of Pedro Duque at the head of a ministry that combined the competences of science, innovation and universities, three areas that he considers inseparable. The new Government that Pedro Sánchez profiles is now taking away that conquest to create a Ministry of Universities assigned to the sociologist Manuel Castells, a decision that has achieved a unanimous rejection of scientists, rectors and leaders in innovation.

“These powers cannot be separated, doing so can cause a fight between these two ministries for resources that are already scarce,” says physicist Perla Wahnón, president of the scientific societies of Spain (Cosce). “It is also a decision contrary to what we see in the main European powers, in the EU executive itself and that reduces political weight to science in the Council of Ministers,” adds Wahnón. “It’s bad news for Spain,” said in a joint statement sent last Friday by Cosce, the rectors of public universities, scientific-medical associations and Severo Ochoa centers and units, the elite of scientific research in Spain.

The key is now in the detailed structure of the new Government, which will define how many powers and budget the Duke Ministry loses in favor of Universities. “The separation of universities and science is not the most recommended model, but it is not something new,” explains Jorge Barrero, general director of the Cotec Foundation. “These powers have been separated for 14 of the last 20 years, first in the Aznar Government, then in the Zapatero Government and since 2012 in the Rajoy Government,” he said. What is unprecedented is that of a ministry of universities separated from education and science, he adds, possibly because most university competences are transferred to the autonomous communities and there is very little left to the State.

In Spain around 70% of scientific research is done by universities, but the state funding they receive for this depends on the National R & D & I Plan managed by the Ministry of Science and is granted based on a competitive competition , hence the suspicions of the research community before possible Solomon divisions of these funds. “Breaking this unique bag to take part of this money to universities would be irresponsible,” says Barrero, who sees it more feasible to give Castells a ministry in charge of lifelong learning that manages Vocational Training, currently attached to Education , and job training courses that depend on Work.

The challenges of the next legislature

“Give me 700 million and I will tell you how many scientists can return to Spain,” Pedro Duque told EL PAÍS in November 2018, four months after taking office. That was an impossible wish because the budgetary pact reached by the Government of Pedro Sánchez and Podemos barely contemplated raising the science budgets by 273 million euros. That pact never materialized and the budgets remain frozen and extended, but Duke can say that he fulfilled one of his main promises: to approve a package of urgent measures for science that ended the previous intervention, the bureaucratic work that was suffocating the public research centers to the point that scientists could not even buy chairs.

In this new term, the main problem will be money again. In 2018, investment in R&D rose a shy 6%, which is explained by the greater investment in the private sector. Scientists now ask for a public counterpart, but without going crazy. They do not even ask to get Spain to spend 2% of GDP on R&D, something that most parties have in their program, including Podemos, but that scientists and experts see completely unfeasible in the short span of four years .

“If this legislature were able to double the budget of the National Plan, which is a total of about 350 million euros, it would be a great achievement,” said Luis Serrano, president of Somma.

This program is bread and salt for the vast majority of scientists in Spain and especially nourishes the middle classes of research, those who do not have the resources or human capital to handle large projects, but who make up the critical mass of the system of public R&D. This group faces in this legislature two years of cuts of up to 20% due to the new calendar of calls promoted by the Duke Ministry and that has helped the scientific community, especially cancer researchers grouped in the ASEICA association. “Our position is to wait and see,” explains Xosé Bustelo, president of this organization. “The minister has so far spoken more than he has done. Hopefully in this term the batteries will be put to solve the pending problems that our suffered R & D & I system has ”, he adds.

“Almost everything remains to be done,” says Pablo Jiménez, spokesman for the Federation of Young Researchers. “The R&D system is dismembered and needs an important money injection,” he says.

Despite the measures against the bureaucracy approved by Duke there are still many present. One of them, explains Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, president of the Society of Medical Oncology, is that under current regulations cooperative groups such as cancer network research centers, cardiovascular or respiratory ailments, among others, are not “tax subjects can be financed, which prevents them from attending calls for public funds, ”he says. “Another objective for Duque’s new mandate should be to create a specific item to conduct independent clinical trials that, due to their objectives, are not profitable for the pharmaceutical industry but that can bring great benefits to patients and the biomedical community,” he explains. These are, for example, studies designed to reuse drugs already approved and without a patent or to carry out studies that prevent cancer patients already cured from having to go through the usual protocol and receive a year of additional treatment.

The forgotten Cajal museum

Manuel Ansede

Another task of the Ministry of Science will be to find a solution for the so-called Cajal Legacy: 22,000 pieces – letters, drawings, manuscripts, photographs – of Santiago Ramón y Cajal that have been stored in boxes in a basement of the Cajal Institute since 1989, a center of the Higher Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) located in Madrid. The scientific community has been calling for the creation of a Ramón y Cajal National Museum for years, dedicated to the winner of the 1906 Nobel Prize in Medicine, father of neuroscience.