The government will spend almost 43 million rubles on the fight against crows on the roof. :: Society :: RBC

“If they’re going to hire falconers, that’s a great option. If this money is spent on some reasonable method of scaring away crows, and not their extermination, then this is a sensible decision, ”the expert said.

According to Schneider, killing the birds could have the opposite effect, as new birds from the wild will come to replace the killed crows.

Read on RBC Pro

Elena Chernova, an employee of the coordination center of the Bird Conservation Union, told RBC that there is no such number of crows in Moscow that needs to be exterminated.

“The number of crows in Moscow has been falling for several years. Their number was reduced by five times without any extermination. They cannot harm the roof in any way if the roof is not made of plasticine, ”explained Chernov.

According to her, it makes sense to use hawks and falcons against pigeons, whose droppings can damage the roof.

Thorns will be removed from the monument to Lenin in Magadan to scare away birds

After the publication of this article, a representative of the Ministry of Natural Resources told RBC that mass crowds of crows pose a threat, since these birds are carriers of diseases, worsen the sanitary condition, harm green spaces and buildings, monuments of architecture.

“Of those used in domestic and foreign practice, an effective means of protection against unwanted accumulations of birds is the use of specially trained hawks and falcons as biorepellants. To achieve the best results, a group of working birds should ideally consist of four or five hawks and two or three falcons, with which four or six operators (falconers) should work in shifts, ”the interlocutor of RBC explained.

“The financing of these works includes the maintenance of the required number of birds of prey, veterinary services, scientific and methodological support of work and genetic control over the livestock of birds of prey, the purchase of equipment and transport support. These works will be carried out by the FGBI VNII Ecology, – he added.

In the summer of 2019 at the lobbies of Moscow metro stations appeared stickers with the image of silhouettes of predators to scare away small birds, which often shattered on the transparent glass of the lobby.

Most often, birds pose a danger to aviation infrastructure facilities. In September 2019, Zhukovsky Airport near Moscow ordered bioacoustic devices and mirror balls for scaring away birds. In 2015, the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov dispersed birds at the airport in Grozny using an unmanned aerial vehicle.

In 2017, Lieutenant General of the Federal Security Service Sergei Khlebnikov statedthat the Kremlin uses noise systems and other technical means to scare away crows.


The New York Procuratorate sues the NRA, the arms lobby

The accuses – “The influence of the NRA – reads a note – was so powerful that the organization went on for decades without controls, while its leaders were making millions of dollars into their pockets”. According to the Democrat James, the president of the association and close friend of the tycoon, Wayne LaPierre, along with three other executives, would have used the donations of the members “as their own piggy bank”, spending tens of millions of dollars for personal purposes and violating laws on non-profit organizations. The allegations range from corruption, financial fraud to a casual use of the association’s money.

The investigation – The allegations emerged at the end of investigations that began in February 2019 and reached what is now a civil case. At least $ 64 million in just three years would be used by those in charge to enrich themselves, family members, friends, political allies, in violation of federal and state laws. But it could take years of legal battles before a resounding dissolution of the organization can occur.

What is the National Rifle Association – Founded in 1871 by retired army officers, after having long been little more than a sports association, it has managed to influence the chambers of politics over the past twenty years – since Wayne La Pierre became its chief executive. was able to shape political classes by supporting candidates who openly took their stand and by opposing those who supported firearms regulation.

With over 5 million members and 148 years of history behind it, it has always been the symbol of thatUS constitution amendment that protects the right of every American to own a firearm. The NRA gave Donald Trump the endorsement in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. The NRA is headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, but is registered as a nonprofit in New York.

Trump’s reaction – The president of the United States, seeing a political reason behind the judicial investigation, immediately intervened to defend the lobby that has always supported him: “Move to Texas, it would be a great state for the organization”. The president owes them a great deal. In fact, on the 2016 election, the NRA, which already controlled all the Republican senators, invested a good 30 million dollars, support that Trump has publicly acknowledged several times.


What phrases from the script “Brother-2” became prophetic

20 years ago, the philosophical thriller “Brother-2” about the adventures of Danila Bagrova (Sergey Bodrov) at USA. The humor that permeates the picture captivates with spontaneity and simplicity. And then no one could have thought that many of the phrases of the heroes would not only become winged, but would be realized by history. “KP“Gives some examples.

“Well then, there were people like people, and suddenly all at once became nerds? Paradox”

Well then, were there people like people, and suddenly all at once became nerds? Paradox.

“Well then, there were people like people, and suddenly all at once became nerds? A paradox.”Photo: frame from the movie

The replica of the nervous taxi driver played by Konstantin Zheldin is universal. Whether it’s the economic and social crisis of the 90s or the epidemiological crisis of our time, the darkest forces within people begin to fuss with tripled energy. So at the height of the coronavirus, there were photos of citizens buying toilet paper and buckwheat, as well as versions about the 5G towers, Bill’s chip plan Gates and the pedophile lobby of Hollywood, which should bring employees FBI covid-19.

“You, bastards, will answer for Sevastopol!”

Unique phrase killer Viktor Bagrov (Victor Sukhorukov) came true 14 years after the release of “Brother-2.” Crimea He returned to his native harbor and the Russian people on the peninsula voted unanimously for this.

“The Russians do not abandon their own in the war”

Events on Donbass, lasting more than five years, also confirm the maxim voiced by Danila.

Russians do not abandon their own in the war.

“- Hey, fellow countryman, where do the Russians live here?”

– Moskal is not my countryman!

– Bandera?

– Why ?!

“Alright guys, bye!”

Perhaps Alexey Balabanov wrote the script as a joke. And the “warm” meeting of the Russian killer with Ukrainian colleagues at the airport is just an episode from the movie. But 14 years have passed, and the slogans “Moskalyak on a dime!”, “Hto not leap, that Muscovite ”and“ Bandera come – put things in order! ” became very popular on Ukraine.

“Strength in them. There is something primitive in them, something animal. What we have long lost. Therefore, they are stronger ”

“Strength in them. There is something primitive in them, something animal. What we have long lost. Therefore, they are stronger. ”Photo: frame from the film.

“Strength in them. There is something primitive in them, something animal. What we have long lost. Therefore, they are stronger ”Photo: frame from the movie.

Before a showdown with local black people who did not allow Russian heroes to eat boiled crayfish, the prostitute Dasha suggests that power is not in the truth, according to Danila and not in money, as his brother is sure, but in “them”, in African-Americans. And if you look at the results of most sports competitions, the absolute triumph of tolerance in the United States, Hollywood cinema and Europeabsorbed by African migrants, it is difficult to disagree with the heroine.

“Conference on new computer technologies … and the protection of computer programs!”

“Conference on new computer technologies … and the protection of computer programs!”Photo:

Laughter with a laugh, namely this meme jokingly explains the official representative MFA RF Maria Zakharova some strange accusations of our country by the USA. But how else to react to the fact that Russian hackers are to blame for the results of the American election?

“Boy, you don’t understand, bring us some vodka. We are flying home! ”

“Boy, you don’t understand, bring us some vodka. We are flying home! ” Photo: frame from the film.

“Boy, you don’t understand, bring us some vodka. We are flying home! ”Photo: frame from the movie.

The phrase prostitutes Marilyn (Daria Jurgens) from the final scene of the film on the plane also became a meme. During the epidemic, Russian citizens, stuck on vacation, began to return to their homeland en masse. It didn’t work for everyone. Those who succeeded reacted in much the same way as the heroine of Brother-2.

“You do not understand – this is quarantine!”

Well, there’s no need to explain anything. American customs officers informing Viktor Bagrov about quarantine teleported in 1990 as if from 2020.


“Brother-2”: How did the fate of the prostitute Marilyn, the hacker Network and Bones Big

The cult picture turns 20 years old (details)


Startups are fighting for a Corona bailout

Hamburg, Berlin The announcement on April 1, of all things, sparked euphoria among start-up lobbyists in Berlin: finance minister Olaf Scholz (SPD) announced a two-billion-euro protective shield especially for emerging tech companies. The efforts to convince the German Startups Association, which was newly formed a few months ago, had obviously borne fruit.

But now the founding lobbyists are worried about the implementation. The association now wants to put pressure on the media again.

“We have just received confirmation that the two billion euros will not be released in the Ministry of Finance. We have therefore already decided to escalate today, to send a letter to Scholz and at the same time to start a small media campaign to increase the pressure, ”says an internal WhatsApp message with which lobbyists will get signatures on Thursday wanted to. The news is available to the Handelsblatt.

Since the beginning of the corona crisis, the start-up association around its boss Christian Miele from venture capitalist Eventures has repeatedly publicly promoted a wide range of help for the industry – including in an online press conference together with the digital representative of the federal government, Thomas Jarzombek (CDU). Now the open letter should increase the pressure.

In the letter to Scholz, the association firstly wants to praise the finance minister for “recognizing the specific needs of startups”. Now the rapid use of the “promised customized instruments is required”.

The letter ends in the appeal: “Keep your word, Minister Scholz! Release the two billion euros! ”Upon request, the association confirmed the existence of the letter, which now has 500 signatories and is expected to be published at the weekend.

“While the other auxiliary instruments have already been focused, there is still no timetable for the start-up measures,” said Christoph Stresing, managing director of the Federal Association of German Startups (BVDS). “Speed ​​is now the order of the day.”

Industry should also take risks

There are obviously good reasons for the hesitant implementation. The federal government is looking for a way to deal with the special situation of the industry. After all, the early-stage investors, who are particularly strong in the German scene, calculate their investments with failure rates of around 80 percent even in normal times. That is why the Federal Ministry of Finance wants to prevent those founders whose business idea is not viable anyway from being supported.

“The topic is complex, because we are talking about support for start-ups about equity financing, which is more likely to default than normal loan financing,” said State Secretary Jörg Kukies on Friday.

So far, the industry has preferred so-called matching. The state should increase funding rounds from venture capitalists. This is how the industry should take risks.

“We want to protect start-ups, not venture capitalists. Therefore, a promotional measure makes sense in which the venture capitalists refill their own money, which is then replenished by the state, ”said the founder of the venture capitalist Lakestar, Klaus Hommels, this week’s Handelsblatt.

However, critics doubt the selfless intentions of venture capitalists. “Why should venture capitalists be the gatekeepers for state aid?” Asks Sven Schmidt, co-founder of Hamburg investor ICS and critic of the industry. Start-ups that are financed without venture capital threaten to be excluded. In addition, the large venture capitalists in particular had earned very well in the past boom years and should not immediately ask for state aid, Schmidt criticizes.

However, the federal government expects the billion dollar umbrella to start soon. “I am confident that we can get the aid on the way quickly. We are in close and constructive exchange with the representatives of the industry to develop a viable concept, “said State Secretary Kukies.

More: Start-up investor Klaus Hommels criticizes state aid for Tui and Adidas


Consumer advocates and the banking industry are promoting uniform supervision


In the future, the financial supervision should monitor the approximately 38,000 financial asset brokers.

(Photo: Reuters)

Berlin Bank associations and consumer advocates tend to have different opinions on regulatory issues. Now they have decided to take an unusual step: In a joint letter to parliamentarians from the government factions, the central association of the German banking industry and the consumer association Bundesverband (vzbv) are calling for a certain legislative process to be pushed ahead.

It is about the planned transfer of supervision of the 38,000 financial asset brokers to the financial supervision Bafin. The cabinet passed the legislative proposal on March 11. The associations are obviously concerned that the transfer of supervision of financial intermediaries to Bafin could be watered down in parliament in the further legislative process. Depending on the federal state, financial intermediaries are currently supervised by trade offices or chambers of industry and commerce (IHK).

Shortly before the parliamentary deliberations on the proposed law began, they wrote: “The concern pursued by the government bill with regard to uniform financial supervision in the sale of financial instruments is of particular importance, particularly in times of crisis.” applicable supervisory law.

In the opinion of the banking associations and consumer protection groups, the previous dual role of the Chamber of Industry and Commerce as a supervisory body and as a representative of the interests of commercial professions questions independent supervision and creates space for conflicts of interest. The level of investor protection should not depend on who the customer is contacting, the associations write.

Vzbv board member Klaus Müller confirmed at the request of the Handelsblatt: “Bundling supervision of financial sales at Bafin has been overdue for years. It is important that compliance with the obligation to behave will in future be checked directly by the Bafin. ”The Corona state of emergency should not lead to important and overdue legislative proposals now being stopped.

Industry resists expensive proposal

The intermediary industry itself has always vehemently opposed the cabinet proposal, which will also entail higher costs. She pointed out that no financial scandals had happened under the previous supervision. So far, the supervision of financial investment brokers and fee brokers in nine federal states has been with the IHK, in the other federal states the trade offices are responsible. Over 80 percent of brokers have a license to broker insurance, the supervision of which is nationwide with the Chamber of Industry and Commerce.

After the Federal Cabinet’s draft was passed, the Union has already indicated that it takes the criticism of the legislative proposal “very seriously”. For the CDU financial expert Carsten Brodesser, the draft goes beyond the coalition agreement. “We now have to prevent the worst in parliamentary proceedings.”

Brodesser outlines possible compromises as follows: If the goal is to have more uniform control, “we could imagine, in coordination with the federal states, to standardize responsibility for, for example, expertise and the supervision of financial investment brokers at the Chamber of Industry and Commerce”. The Bafin’s powers could be strengthened in such a way that it sets uniform standards for supervision by the IHK and monitors them. But the SPD would have to play for that. At least the vzbv and the banking associations have clearly positioned themselves with the letter.

More: Financial investment brokers defend themselves against Bafin supervision.


What power big business has in the US election campaign

Hardly noticed by the general public, a completely different “virus” is spreading beneath the headline-heavy corona surface: the increasing influence of American big business and its lobbyists on the election decision. How did this “virus” begin its triumphal march, and what does that mean for the future of Western leadership?

The last American presidential election campaign cost $ 6.5 billion – almost a hundred times more than the expenditure for the German federal election campaign 2017. It is becoming apparent that the upcoming US election battle will be even more expensive than four years ago.

The billionaire Michael Bloomberg alone spent a good $ 500 million on his candidacy. After all, Bloomberg’s failure shows that not only actual or supposed billionaires can become president in the United States.

Trump’s opponent Biden’s net worth is estimated at a comparatively modest $ 9 million. Still, there is no end in sight to the breathtaking spending in American election campaigns and their phenomenal increases.

Tangible economic interests

Why can US donation kings and lobbyists increasingly influence political decisions? Obviously, this is not about noble political ideals, but about tangible economic interests. Because the outcome of a presidential election has a direct impact on company share prices.

Scientific studies show that companies that brought a former politician to the board before the election increase in their share value if the ex-politician’s party wins the election – regardless of the industry.

Even the amount of donations the company made before the election is secondary. Donations are obviously not perceived as permanent. It is only with the post of a board member for a former politician – Democrat or Republican – that the company becomes politically committed.

Conversely, this also means that after the presidential election, the share prices of companies that have put a former politician on the shield whose party was unsuccessful in the election fall. In principle, however, the US stock markets welcome the appointments of former politicians to board members, especially when the ex-politician is hired for the first time in the economy.

When you join another company, the effect is still positive, but much weaker – the whole thing is like a tea bag that loses its aroma the more you use it.

Companies with former politicians get more government contracts

The importance of former politicians and their networks to the US economy is also so great because in the United States, lucrative government contracts worth over several hundred billion dollars are advertised and awarded to companies each year.

Corporations, especially in the armaments sector, which benefit particularly from government contracts, often have former politicians of both the Democrats and the Republicans in their ranks for security reasons. Empirical studies show that companies in which former politicians of the respective majority party in the Senate and House of Representatives hold board positions receive significantly more government contracts than companies with missing or “wrong” political connections.

In addition to government mandates, ex-politicians are also committed to maintaining the political landscape for their company in general – whether it is about relaxing environmental protection requirements or tax policy initiatives.

The donation kings’ billions of dollars in turn are concentrated in a few areas in US election campaigns to convince voters of the respective candidate. Ultimately, only a few swing states are decisive for the outcome of the presidential election. Because the victorious party in a state receives all voters, regardless of how much they won that state.

With a simple majority in one state: “The winner takes it all.” Since California or New York, for example, traditionally fall to the Democrats and other states like Nebraska or Oklahoma to the Republicans, election campaigns hardly take place there. The money flows massively to states like Florida and Ohio, which ultimately decide.

Unlimited company donations to parties possible

The Supreme Court ruled that the growing importance of big business and its lobbyists for the outcome of presidential elections was strongly encouraged. In 2010, the United States Supreme Court primarily dealt with the issue of the right to freedom of expression for companies in the Citizens United case.

In fact, the question was whether companies can donate to parties and their candidates without limit. The judges decided that this should be possible. President Barack Obama said that this decision would give lobbyists significantly more power in Washington.

Obama saw the danger that elections would ultimately no longer be decided by the American people but by powerful interest groups. The development of party donations in the years after the verdict proves him right, they have risen again significantly.

For the Western leadership, this “virus” is putting democratic legitimacy to the test because big business can undermine the principle of “one man, one vote”. Nevertheless, this development does not threaten America’s strong position on the world stage, at least as long as rivals Russia and China are governed autocratically or dictatorially.

At the same time, the never-ending speculation about Russian influence on the 2016 US presidential election shows the importance of the election for other global players. Moscow and Beijing’s interests in trade and investment in particular are likely to be massively influenced by the answer to the question of whether the next American president is Donald Trump or Joe Biden.

More: Recession instead of economic boom: The rules of the game for the US election campaign have changed. The president is behind in polls – and has to rethink.


An economic stimulus package for the climate

Dusseldorf Numerous business associations, companies and environmental protection associations wrote to the Chancellor on Monday. Your demand: The billion dollar stimulus packages according to Corona should above all take climate change into account.

“The necessary investment aids can set the course that will determine social and economic development over decades,” says the letter, which the Federal Association of Energy and Water Management (BDEW), the Association of Municipal Enterprises (VKU) and others say hundred individual environmental organizations and companies like the energy company Engie have signed. “It is up to you to use the economic break from Covid-19 for a sustainable restart of our economy,” the signatories demand.

The world is currently fighting the consequences of the global corona pandemic with a lot of money. Only one industry often seems to be losing out: the energy industry. The EU Commission has already put numerous projects of the planned “Green Deal” on hold, while some politicians are already demanding that the planned CO2 tax be postponed in order to protect car and aviation companies after the crisis.

Numerous industries for which greater climate protection means disadvantages are protesting loudly against further climate policy requirements, whether nationally or at EU level. It is not just the affected energy industry that warns of such decisions.

The Agora think tank fears that the corona crisis could lead to “reluctance to make investments that are relevant to climate protection”. That is why the Berlin experts are proposing a € 100 billion program. Investments are to be made in wind power, electric cars, hydrogen and intelligent power grids.

Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency (IEA), is now demanding that governments invest more in climate-friendly industries. A kind of “green reboot” as an opportunity after the crisis.

“Economic revival after the corona crisis and climate protection are not a contradiction in terms,” ​​says Manfred Schmitz, CEO of Engie Germany, the Handelsblatt. After all, the financial crisis had learned that it was important to “invest part of the funds more appropriately in promising areas”.

At that time, Germany promoted, for example, the scrapping premium for the scrapping of older vehicles to promote the auto industry. Anyone who sent their intact car to the scrap press received a grant of 2,500 euros from the state for the new purchase.

This measure was anything but beneficial for the climate. “It is precisely for this reason that we as an Engie group joined the Green Recovery Alliance,” explains Schmitz.

Lobbying battle for economic stimulus

The alliance of more than 180 CEOs, including from UnileverIkea Eon, Engie and Volvo, Politicians and organizations want to organize measures to revive the economy after the corona crisis based on the European Green Deal.

If the economy suddenly collapses, climate protection is no longer the most urgent problem. There is growing concern that nobody wants to spend any more money on the energy transition. A real lobbying battle ensues for the multi-billion dollar economic stimulus.

Handelsblatt Morning Briefing - Corona Spezial

While the car industry is hoping for a new scrapping premium, environmentalists fear that the turnaround in traffic will stall. The environmental association BUND therefore calls for public funds to be tied to ecological requirements.

“The smartest economic stimulus is the one that triggers investments in climate protection technologies. Because these are investments in the future, ”warns Kerstin Andreae, head of BDEW in an interview with the Handelsblatt. Suspending climate protection measures now is exactly the wrong way to go. “Crisis management and climate protection must not be played off against each other,” says Andreae.

The association presented a five-point catalog on Friday. Among other things, it calls for the cover for photovoltaic subsidies to be lifted, for the electricity price to be exempted from taxes and duties at short notice, and for distance rules for wind turbines to be waived on land. The energy transition should not be neglected because of the corona crisis, because “climate change does not stick to a lockdown,” emphasizes BDEW boss Andreae.

As good as the exit restrictions in many countries are doing the climate right now: Even during the financial crisis of 2008, there was a worldwide kink in the curve of greenhouse gas emissions. After that, however, it only rose again all the more steeply. After all, it was about jobs and the economy. Climate protection was of secondary importance.

More: Why Corona is good for the climate, but slows down the energy transition.


How Jörg Asmussen navigates GDV through the crisis

In the past few days, the pressure from Asmussen’s former colleagues from politics has become too great. The insurers – known for their still well-stocked coffers – should not steal their responsibility for the economy with reference to different contractual arrangements, the statements of governments were not only in Germany.

Since then, the insurance industry has faced a huge image problem. Many critics confirmed their view that the industry would always withdraw with reference to the fine print if there were expensive costs. The insurers shifted responsibility to the industry association GDV, which should look for a uniform solution.

For Jörg Asmussen, it was the first major test in the new environment. There was considerable pressure on the 53-year-old, since even healthy companies have faced financial difficulties in recent days.

Above all because many business partners, some of whom had long trading relationships, no longer dared to do so, and the internationally secured trade in goods at home and abroad threatened to stall.

A quick and surprising solution, in which Jörg Asmussen also played a key role, came on Thursday. The Federal Government and the German credit insurers agreed on the establishment of a protective shield in the amount of 30 billion euros to secure the movement of goods. This gives suppliers the certainty that they will also receive money, even if their customers cannot pay in times of tight budgets.

High loss is programmed

For Jörg Asmussen and the insurers, however, the deal was not in vain. Not only do they commit to largely maintaining their previous credit limits of around € 400 billion, they also transfer 65 percent of their premium income to the federal government this year. Last year, the total amount was a remarkable 817 million euros.

A loss is almost inevitable for the successful industry this year. Nevertheless, praise comes from the industry for what the association has negotiated in the shortest possible time. “Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures”, Ron van het Hof evaluates the deal between Asmussens Verband and the German government.

The Dutchman is the CEO of Euler Hermes in the German-speaking countries and refers to the eminent importance of such security chains for the German middle class. With a market share of almost 50 percent allianceSubsidiary, known for its Hermes loan guarantees, by far the largest credit insurer in Germany.

For Asmussen, whose path at the GDV from the Presidium member to the General Manager is already planned for October 1, quite different priorities are emerging than he formulated when he became known when he joined the association in January.

Handelsblatt Morning Briefing - Corona Spezial

The graduate economist emphasized that insurers could make a major contribution to private retirement provision and in dealing with risks such as climate change and cyber security. All these issues will still be overshadowed by the corona crisis when Asmussen takes over the management of the association in autumn.

There is no doubt in the association that he will continue to be available for quick and sometimes extraordinary solutions. “With his extensive experience, Mr. Asmussen will give the German insurance industry a powerful voice as future general manager,” says Wolfgang Weiler, the long-time boss of Huk-Coburg and current president of GDV.

The industry association has known that Asmussen, who is known as a string puller, does not need a long familiarization period since this week at the latest.

More: The federal government and credit insurers secure German trade


Federal government also involved: Broad call for eco-stimulus package

Climate protection

In the call for the corona crisis, experts are calling for the conversion to a climate-neutral economy.

(Photo: dpa)

Berlin, Brussels The economy must recover after the Corona crisis – but please sustainably: This is what politicians, company heads, unions, associations and experts from all over Europe are demanding. On Tuesday, they published a call, which was also signed by Federal Environment Minister Svenja Schulze (SPD).

“After the crisis, the time for reconstruction will come,” it says. “The transformation to a climate-neutral economy, the protection of biodiversity and the transformation of the agricultural and food industry offer the opportunity to quickly build jobs and growth – and can help to make societies more resilient.”

The initiative was launched by Pascal Canfin, chairman of the European Parliament’s Environment Committee. Schulze said that there is already an opportunity to develop a new wealth model. “This new model must be based on the climate targets, give the necessary tailwind to a climate-neutral economy across Europe and help us to master future challenges together.” She is pleased about the non-partisan initiative.

The letter is signed by ministers from eleven EU countries, 79 MEPs and the bosses of companies such as L’Oreal, Ikea and Danone.

Last week, 13 European environment ministers had asked not to forget the dangers of climate change and biodiversity in the wake of the Corona crisis, and to use the European Green Deal as a framework for boosting the economy. Schulze had signed that too.

More: The corona crisis means millions of tons of carbon dioxide saved. In the long term, however, the pandemic is likely to slow the energy transition.


Half of Germans consider health to be more important than business

Empty restaurants

Many Germans are worried about the economic future.

(Photo: dpa)

Dusseldorf Should the German economy stand still? Or are you slowly starting up again? The Germans have a fairly clear stance on this: Around every second person believes that the federal government should first concentrate on limiting the spread of the corona virus, even if this would result in negative economic consequences such as a recession and the loss of thousands of jobs.

Only 26 percent of Germans believe that supporting the economy is more important. This was the result of a representative survey by the communications consultancy Kekst CNC, which is exclusively available to the Handelsblatt.

Nevertheless, many Germans are worried about the economic future. More than one in three fears that his employer could get into financial difficulties in the current situation. 18 percent of those surveyed shortly before Easter even assume that they will lose their jobs.

However, despite individual fears, more than two thirds of Germans expect that the effects of the virus crisis on the economy and companies will be significantly greater than the effects on them personally.

In the eyes of the Germans, the state therefore plays a decisive role in overcoming the crisis. According to the survey, 67 percent believe that the government should save the most important companies if they stumble in the corona crisis.

It is also noteworthy, as the Kekst-CNC survey also showed, that the call for state intervention in Germany is much louder than in countries like the USA or Great Britain. The fear of losing a job is greatest in the United States.


The work of the federal government, as other surveys have already shown, is meanwhile largely assessed positively: 64 percent of Germans support the active role of the grand coalition in combating the corona crisis.

44 percent said the behavior of the government had increased their confidence in them. Only 21 percent of Germans have lost confidence in the federal government.

The picture is quite different in the USA, where the government of US President Donald Trump has long hesitated to take measures against the virus. 35 percent of Americans said their confidence in the government had declined.

It is clear, however, that at least many Germans think that the world will change after the corona crisis. Almost every third German wants to fly less, a similar number want to reduce the number of trips abroad – and 26 percent stated that they would like to spend more time outdoors in the future.

More: Corona crisis: Zero hour – How a responsible restart of the economy succeeds. Read more here.