Whistleblowers provide Republican evidence as Trump trumpets for unmasking


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The US official sent. President Donald Trump knew that an inquiry against a whistleblower was available to President Donald Trump, communicating directly with Republicans about the information committee that led the inquiry, his lawyers said Sunday.

The action was in response to Republican efforts, led by Trump, to the whistleblower, a member of the US intelligence community whose identity is not loose to argue, said the lawyer Mark Zaid.

“Republicans asked our client's identity to expose their safety, and their safety, to risk,” Zaid wrote on Twitter.

The news of the tender came as Trump asked the whistleblower to emerge, moving away from procedures in such cases.

“The Whistleblower was very reluctant to have to come forward,” Trump said in Twitter's morning job.

Later outside the White House, Trump asked the whistleblower “Guy Obama” and fraud and said, “The whistleblower should be revealed.” T

Republicans complained about the inquiry into a determination in the House of Representatives that was led by the Democrats and was unfair and Trump, and that they were restricted in questioning witnesses. The rules-based inquiry followed the House.

The Republican president is under greater pressure as the House of Representatives comes to the fore to inquire whether Trump sought the aid of Ukraine in its bid for re-election next year.

The leaders of the Democratic Control House are hoping to start public hearings in the coming weeks.

Three White House Office Management and Budget officials are unlikely to be requesting requests from House investigators this week, an administration officer said.

The inquiry was launched on 24 September following a whistleblower's complaint sent by the informal information officer. He was concerned that the president's actions on Ukraine were illegal and jeopardized national security.

However, as the inquiry comes on its sixth week, the evidence of the whistleblower, based on second-hand information provided by other US officials, is unlikely to be the most important.

Since then, law makers in charge of the inquiry heard accounts from US officials, including Alexander Vindman, a former member of the National Security Council, who describes Trump's efforts to put pressure on the Democratic candidate, Joe. Biden, and his son Hunter, as well as accusations he used $ 391 million in US aid as leverage.

A summary of White House on a telephone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy showed that Trump was asking his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate the Bidens.

Democracy Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Information Committee, said last month that evidence of whistleblowers might not be necessary.

The whistleblower initially offered to answer questions in writing if they were submitted by the House Information Committee as a whole.

Zaid said that the new offer, made on Saturday's top panel of Republican Devin Nunes, showed that the client wanted the complaint to be handled in a non-colleague way.

“Let me be absolutely clear: Our willingness to co-operate has not changed. However, we mean aggressive than the attempt to reveal the identity of the whistleblower, ”said Andrew Bakaj, another of the whistleblowers' lawyers.

The Nunes office did not submit a request for comments.

It is the policy of the Long-standing Information Committee to protect the name of the whistleblower.

Trump has repeatedly disappeared at the whistleblower and asked for his identity to be made public. He denies any misconduct and says that the political horror is motivated.

“They have the right to remain anonymous,” said Schiff after Vindman the tightening last week.

FILE FILE: President Donald Trump talks to the media on the South White House in Washington, U., before departing to New York, 2 November, 2019. REUTERS / Yuri Gripas / File Photo

Trump said on Sunday that Schiff cannot be trusted to release accurate transcripts of evidence from witnesses in the inquiry, saying that Twitter was “a liar, leaker & a proven tracker” who should be brought to the attention! ”

Republican lawmakers should “put their own transcripts on the interviews to oppose Schiff's propaganda,” he said.

Reporting by Dóna Chiacu and Andrea Shalal; Edited by Lincoln Feast and Clarence Fernandez

Our Standards:The principles of Thomson Reuters Trust.

(TTTranslate tags) US (t) USA (t) TRUMP (t) CONTACT (t) Crime / Law / Justice (t) America (t) Elections / Voting (t) Judicial Process / Court Cases / Court Decisions (t) available (t) Diplomacy / Foreign Policy (t) Media and Publishing (TRBC) (t) Crime (t) Government / Politics (t) Ukraine (t) General News (t) House of United States Representatives (t) Major News (t) Europe (t) US Government News (t) Pictures (t) Media / Publishing (Heritage) (t) International / National Security (t) Senate of the United States (t) Presidential Elections (t) United States of America


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.