A new law in Australia is attempting to curb social media use among young people, though full enforcement may prove difficult. While teenagers and social media companies are expected to find ways around the restrictions, the law’s passage—and its widespread support—is likely to establish a social norm leading to a decrease in social media engagement by minors.
Shifting Norms and Legal Challenges
The law’s success may not hinge on strict enforcement, but rather on a change in societal attitudes. It is anticipated that within five years, it could become uncommon to find fourteen- or fifteen-year-olds in Australia who have ever posted on social media. This approach mirrors past efforts to reduce youth smoking, which relied on both legal restrictions and a shift in social norms.
The debate over restricting social media access raises questions about free speech, particularly in the United States. A civil-libertarian argument—supported by powerful tech companies—suggests that age limits and identification checks for online expression are unwarranted. However, some argue that government intervention is justified to protect children, even if it means limiting access to social media as a news source.
The American Context
While an Australia-like ban is considered unlikely in the U.S. due to First Amendment concerns, a shift in social norms may still occur. This change is already visible in the growing movement to ban cellphones from classrooms, with over thirty states now having some form of restriction in place.
Politicians are increasingly discussing the values needed to build a healthy society in the digital age, as highlighted by Times columnist Ezra Klein in a recent piece on the “politics of attention.” This suggests a growing recognition that society cannot remain neutral regarding how people live their digital lives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will this law be strictly enforced in Australia?
It seems most likely that the law will not be rigidly enforced, as teenagers and social media companies are expected to find ways to circumvent the ban.
What is the argument against restricting social media access?
The civil-libertarian argument suggests that arbitrary age limits on online expression and mandatory I.D. checks are inappropriate, and that social media can be a source of news, even if imperfect.
Is a similar law likely to pass in the United States?
A law like the one in Australia is considered unlikely to pass in the U.S. due to the country’s commitment to free speech and the influence of domestic tech companies.
As concerns about the impact of social media on young people continue to grow, will we see a broader societal reevaluation of our relationship with technology and its role in daily life?
