news
Former Justice and Development Party (AKP) figures Şamil Tayyar and Mücahit Birinci have publicly proposed integrating Berat Albayrak and Bilal Erdoğan into central party roles to address ongoing internal instability. The suggestions, which include appointing Albayrak as a strong chief advisor, follow admissions from party insiders regarding internal “grouping” and the erosion of the party’s foundations.
Proposed roles for party leadership
Şamil Tayyar has identified Berat Albayrak as the most suitable candidate for a high-level advisory position within the organization. Tayyar argues that such an appointment is necessary to address the internal crisis, stating that the party’s foundation is currently being undermined. These proposals suggest a shift toward utilizing former officials to consolidate authority amid reports of factionalism.

Mücahit Birinci has also weighed in on the party’s future, framing the potential inclusion of figures like Bilal Erdoğan within the context of long-term succession planning. According to reports, these discussions reflect an attempt to stabilize the party’s internal dynamics by elevating individuals with established ties to the current power structure.
The recent debate among former AKP officials highlights a perceived need for “strong chief advisory” roles as a mechanism to counter internal divisions and address the management of the party’s political trajectory.
Context of internal party instability
The calls for leadership realignment are rooted in concerns over what insiders describe as the “hollowing out” of the party. While some figures advocate for specific appointments to restore order, the discourse underscores a broader acknowledgment of structural challenges within the AKP. The emergence of these suggestions in public forums indicates that the debate over the party’s direction is no longer confined to private meetings.
The public nature of these suggestions suggests a significant level of internal friction. By proposing specific individuals for advisory or future leadership roles, these former officials are attempting to influence the party’s internal power balance, signaling that the current organizational structure may be facing pressure from competing factions.
Potential consequences for the party
If the party leadership chooses to act on these recommendations, it could lead to a formal restructuring of advisory roles or a change in the influence of specific figures within the executive circle. Analysts suggest that the movement to place Albayrak or Erdoğan in prominent positions is likely a strategy to unify base support and quell internal dissent. Conversely, if these suggestions remain unheeded, the reported “grouping” and factionalism within the AKP may continue to challenge the party’s internal cohesion.

Frequently Asked Questions
Who proposed that Berat Albayrak take a new role in the party?
Former AKP figure Şamil Tayyar suggested that Berat Albayrak is the most suitable name for a “strong chief advisory” position to address internal party crises.
What is the primary concern driving these suggestions?
According to the statements from Tayyar and others, there is a concern that the party’s foundations are being “undermined” by internal groupism and structural instability.
What role has been discussed for Bilal Erdoğan?
Discussions involving figures like Mücahit Birinci have linked Bilal Erdoğan to the party’s future as a potential successor or a key figure in the party’s long-term leadership framework.
Do you believe that structural changes in party leadership can effectively resolve internal factionalism?











