India is navigating a complex geopolitical situation in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021. Historically hesitant to engage with the group due to its ideological alignment with Pakistan and its hard-line interpretation of Islam, India now finds itself compelled to interact with the Taliban regime to prevent further instability in the region. This shift reflects a pragmatic approach rooted in both moral realism and strategic considerations.
A Convergence of Thought
The situation highlights a surprising convergence between seemingly disparate schools of thought: Christian realism, as articulated by theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, and the ancient Indian political philosophy of Kautilya. Both frameworks acknowledge the limitations of morality in international politics, recognizing that power is unavoidable and that inaction can be as detrimental as wrongdoing. India’s current approach, therefore, isn’t a departure from its values, but a recognition of the tragic realities of statecraft.
Pakistan played a significant role in the Taliban’s rise to power, providing material and armed assistance. However, relations between Pakistan and the Taliban have since deteriorated due to the Taliban’s refusal to address the issue of Pakistani Taliban fighters operating within Afghanistan.
The Dilemma of Engagement
India faces a difficult choice. Complete non-engagement risks allowing Pakistan to increase its influence in Afghanistan, undermining India’s strategic interests. Conversely, engaging with the Taliban could be perceived as a compromise of India’s moral principles. This dilemma is framed by Niebuhr’s concept of “proximate justice”—accepting less-than-ideal outcomes to prevent worse consequences. Kautilya’s Arthashastra similarly emphasizes prudent engagement with flawed actors to avoid greater disorder.
India’s response to a devastating earthquake in Afghanistan in September 2025, providing early aid and medical assistance, demonstrates a commitment to the Afghan people despite the political realities. This humanitarian aid, along with the granting of student and medical visas to Afghans, underscores India’s focus on supporting the Afghan populace.
Strategic Considerations and Kautilya’s Framework
India’s policy is also informed by Kautilya’s Mandala theory, which views international relations as a concentric circle of states. In this framework, Pakistan is considered a “foe” (Ari), while the Taliban is currently being utilized as an “ally” (Mitra) to counter Pakistani influence. This isn’t an endorsement of the Taliban, but a strategic calculation based on preventing adverse outcomes. Kautilya’s six-fold policy, or Shadgunya Niti, is also evident, with India pursuing a “dual policy” of engagement with the Taliban and continued opposition to Pakistan.
India is employing Kautilya’s four “expedients” – conciliation through diplomatic outreach, offering concessions like humanitarian aid, utilizing the Taliban to counter Pakistan’s designs, and employing coercive measures against Pakistani-sponsored terrorism – to achieve its objectives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is India engaging with the Taliban after previously avoiding contact?
India’s engagement is driven by the need to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a haven for terrorist groups and to protect its strategic interests in the region, even if it means dealing with a regime it previously opposed.
What is “proximate justice” and how does it apply to India’s policy?
“Proximate justice,” as defined by Reinhold Niebuhr, acknowledges that perfect justice is unattainable and that responsible actors must strive for the least unjust outcome possible. In this context, India’s engagement with the Taliban is seen as a way to mitigate a potentially worse situation in Afghanistan.
How does Kautilya’s philosophy influence India’s approach?
Kautilya’s emphasis on strategic realism, the acceptance of power politics, and the use of pragmatic tools like alliances and coercion informs India’s policy, guiding it to prioritize national interests and regional stability.
Ultimately, India’s approach to Afghanistan reflects a recognition that navigating a complex and often tragic world requires a balance of moral considerations and strategic imperatives.
How might the evolving relationship between Pakistan and the Taliban impact India’s long-term strategy in Afghanistan?
Keep reading