Israel’s Prime Minister’s office stated Saturday that a recently announced Gaza executive board, unveiled by the White House on Friday, was not coordinated with Israel and is contrary to Israeli government policy.
Details of the Dispute
The announcement concerns a board intended to help establish a transitional technocratic Palestinian administration in Gaza, as part of the second phase of a plan initially announced by US President Donald Trump in September to end the war. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar is expected to discuss the matter with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
While the specific point of contention regarding the board’s composition remains undisclosed – an Israeli government spokesperson declined to comment – the inclusion of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan is a key factor. Israel has consistently opposed any Turkish role in Gaza.
Other members of the executive board include Sigrid Kaag, the UN special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, and an Israeli-Cypriot billionaire.
Potential Implications
The lack of coordination with Israel could strain relations between the two countries. It is possible that further discussions between Israeli and US officials could lead to modifications of the board’s composition or its mandate.
Alternatively, the US may proceed with the board as currently constituted, potentially signaling a shift in its approach to regional diplomacy. A continued impasse could also lead to Israel pursuing independent actions regarding Gaza.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the Gaza executive board?
The board is intended to help create a transitional technocratic Palestinian administration in Gaza, as part of a broader plan to end the war.
Who is raising concerns about the board?
Israel’s Prime Minister’s office has stated the board was not coordinated with Israel and runs counter to government policy. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar will raise the issue with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Why does Israel object to Turkish involvement?
The source states that Israel has repeatedly opposed any Turkish role in Gaza, but does not specify the reasons for this opposition.
How will the differing views on the composition of this board affect the future of Gaza?
