Indulto a Álvaro García Ortiz: El Ministerio de Justicia estudia las primeras peticiones

    <p class="article-text">
        Spain’s Ministry of Justice has initiated the process to review the first requests for pardon on behalf of former State Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz. This follows reports from <a href="https://elpais.com/espana/2026-01-27/primera-peticion-de-indulto-para-el-ex-fiscal-general-del-estado-el-gobierno-activa-la-maquinaria-y-pide-informe-al-supremo.html" target="_blank" data-mrf-recirculation="links-noticia" class="link">El País</a> and confirmation from elDiario.es. The Ministry has requested a preliminary report from the Supreme Court, a standard first step in processing such requests for clemency. Legal sources indicate the file was expected to be sent to the sentencing court last week.
    </p>

    <aside class="know-more know-more--with-image">
        <a href="https://www.eldiario.es/politica/condena-fiscal-general-culmina-causas-polemicas-historia-tribunal-supremo_1_12787741.html" data-mrf-recirculation="saber-mas" data-dl-event="saber-mas">
            <p class="know-more__title">The conviction of the Attorney General concludes one of the most controversial cases in the history of the Supreme Court</p>
            <picture class="know-more__img">
                <source media="(max-width: 767px)" type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.webp">
                <source media="(max-width: 767px)" type="image/jpg" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.jpg">
                <source media="(min-width: 768px)" type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.webp">
                <source media="(min-width: 768px)" type="image/jpg" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.jpg">
                <source type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.webp">
                <img class="lazy" loading="lazy" data-src="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/ef52d2f8-c8c6-4076-84ce-317f81a8111a_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=" http:="" viewbox="0 0 880 495" alt="The conviction of the Attorney General concludes one of the most controversial cases in the history of the Supreme Court"/>
            </picture>
        </a>
    </aside>

    <p class="article-text">
        Following input from the Prosecutor's Office, the court will determine if grounds exist to grant this measure of grace, regulated by a law from 1870 and enshrined in the Constitution. García Ortiz was <a href="https://www.eldiario.es/politica/supremo-considera-ex-fiscal-general-alguien-entorno-filtraron-confesion-pareja-ayuso_1_12816435.html" target="_blank" data-mrf-recirculation="links-noticia" class="link">sentenced to a two-year disqualification</a> for leaking the confession of businessman Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, who is facing two tax offenses.
    </p>

    <h2>The Shifting Landscape of Presidential Pardons and Judicial Independence</h2>

    <p>
        This case highlights a growing tension between executive clemency and the principles of judicial independence. While the power to pardon is a long-held tradition in many legal systems – including the US system of presidential pardons – its use is increasingly scrutinized.  The potential for political influence in pardon decisions raises concerns about fairness and the rule of law.  Recent high-profile pardons globally have sparked debate, with critics arguing they undermine the integrity of the judicial process.
    </p>

    <p>
        The Spanish system, with its reliance on a Supreme Court report, attempts to mitigate this risk. However, the report is not binding, leaving the final decision with the Council of Ministers. This creates a delicate balance between executive discretion and judicial oversight.  Similar systems exist in countries like Italy and Germany, where advisory bodies play a role in pardon recommendations.
    </p>

    <h2>Partial vs. Full Pardons: A Spectrum of Possibilities</h2>

    <p>
        Even if the Supreme Court report is unfavorable, a full pardon – remitting all unserved penalties – is unlikely. The law stipulates a favorable report from the sentencing court is required for a full pardon. However, a partial pardon remains a possibility. This could involve forgiving some or all of the remaining penalties, or commuting the sentence to a less severe one.
    </p>

    <p>
        The concept of partial pardons offers a nuanced approach.  For example, a judge might reduce a prison sentence while upholding a fine, or remove a disqualification from holding public office. This flexibility allows for a tailored response based on the specific circumstances of the case.  In the US, commutation of sentences is a common form of partial pardon, often used to address perceived injustices in sentencing guidelines.
    </p>

    <aside class="know-more know-more--with-image">
        <a href="https://www.eldiario.es/politica/sentencia-inquietante-150-juristas-firman-manifiesto-condena-supremo-ex-fiscal-general_1_12939297.html" data-mrf-recirculation="saber-mas-abajo" data-dl-event="saber-mas-abajo">
            <p class="know-more__title">“An unsettling sentence”: 150 jurists sign a manifesto against the Supreme Court’s conviction of the former Attorney General</p>
            <picture class="know-more__img">
                <source media="(max-width: 767px)" type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.webp">
                <source media="(max-width: 767px)" type="image/jpg" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.jpg">
                <source media="(min-width: 768px)" type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.webp">
                <source media="(min-width: 768px)" type="image/jpg" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_50p_0.jpg">
                <source type="image/webp" srcset="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.webp">
                <img class="lazy" loading="lazy" data-src="https://static.eldiario.es/clip/7302b029-b7b3-447c-a0b5-3d6c947934a7_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=" http:="" viewbox="0 0 880 495" alt="&quot;An unsettling sentence&quot;: 150 jurists sign a manifesto against the Supreme Court’s conviction of the former Attorney General"/>
            </picture>
        </a>
    </aside>

    <p class="article-text">
        If a pardon is granted, it will be formalized through a royal decree – signed by King Felipe VI – and published in the Official State Gazette. While the 1870 law initially required pardons to be “motivated,” a 1988 reform removed this explicit requirement. This change reflects a broader trend towards greater executive discretion in pardon decisions.
    </p>

    <p class="article-text">
        The <a href="https://www.eldiario.es/politica/union-progresista-fiscales-apoya-peticion-indulto-garcia-ortiz_1_12853840.html" target="_blank" data-mrf-recirculation="links-noticia" class="link">Progressive Union of Prosecutors</a>, an association formerly led by Álvaro García Ortiz, has publicly supported a petition for his pardon. “We call on citizens to support this initiative,” the association stated on social media while sharing a petition circulated by the Spanish Association for International Law of Human Rights (AEDIDH) to support the government granting clemency following his conviction.
    </p>

    <h2>Future Trends: Transparency and Public Debate</h2>

    <p>
        The García Ortiz case is likely to fuel further debate about the pardon process.  Expect to see increased calls for greater transparency, including the publication of Supreme Court reports and the reasoning behind executive decisions.  Public pressure and media scrutiny will continue to play a significant role in shaping the outcome of pardon requests.
    </p>

    <p>
        Furthermore, the rise of digital activism and online petitions – as seen with the AEDIDH petition – will empower citizens to participate more directly in the process.  This could lead to a more democratic and accountable system of clemency.  The trend towards restorative justice principles may also influence pardon decisions, focusing on rehabilitation and reconciliation rather than solely on punishment.
    </p>

    <h3>FAQ: Pardons in Spain</h3>

    <ul>
        <li><b>What is an indulto?</b> A pardon, or *indulto*, is a measure of grace granted by the Spanish government that can reduce or eliminate penalties imposed by a court.</li>
        <li><b>Who decides on a pardon?</b> The Council of Ministers, on the proposal of the Minister of Justice, makes the final decision.</li>
        <li><b>Is the Supreme Court’s report binding?</b> No, the report is advisory only.</li>
        <li><b>What is the difference between a full and partial pardon?</b> A full pardon remits all unserved penalties, while a partial pardon forgives some penalties or commutes the sentence to a less severe one.</li>
    </ul>

    <p>
        <b>Pro Tip:</b> Understanding the legal framework surrounding pardons is crucial for anyone involved in the justice system or following high-profile cases.  Resources like the Spanish Constitution and relevant legislation provide valuable insights.
    </p>

    <p>
        Do you think the pardon process needs more transparency? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Explore our other articles on Spanish law and politics for more in-depth analysis. <a href="#">Subscribe to our newsletter</a> for the latest updates.
    </p>
</div>