A recent appearance by Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, presented as a live question-and-answer session with national and international media, has sparked controversy. A detail regarding the time displayed on the watch of journalist Arleen Rodríguez Derivet, who moderated the event, has raised questions about whether the event was pre-recorded.
Rodríguez Derivet’s watch reportedly showed a time around 5 p.m., contradicting the official claim that the event was broadcast live that morning. This discrepancy is being cited as evidence that the appearance was filmed and edited before being presented as a live event.
Limited International Press Access
Criticism has also focused on the absence of independent international news agencies. Despite announcements of foreign press participation, only correspondents from media outlets aligned with the Cuban government were present, including RT (Russia) and Xinhua (China). The state-run Prensa Latina was presented as an “international” representative, further fueling concerns, as observers had anticipated the presence of agencies like EFE, AFP, or AP.
The official YouTube account of the Cuban Presidency described the event as a dialogue between President Díaz-Canel and representatives of national and foreign media, covering topics such as the internal situation of the country, the impact of recent U.S. administration measures, international support, relations with Venezuela, and potential dialogue with Washington.
However, many within Cuban society—particularly those following discussions on social media and alternative news sources—believe the controlled format, with aligned journalists and no independent press, reinforces a perception that the government favors manipulated presentations over authentic, live events.
As of this reporting, Cuban authorities have not publicly clarified whether the appearance was pre-recorded or responded to accusations of manipulation. The controversy surrounding the watch and the lack of independent international media continue to cast doubt on the authenticity of what was presented as a “live” dialogue.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the stated purpose of the event?
According to the official description, the event was a dialogue between President Díaz-Canel and media representatives regarding the internal situation of the country, the impact of U.S. measures, international support, relations with Venezuela, and potential dialogue with Washington.
Which international media outlets were reportedly present?
RT (Russia) and Xinhua (China) were present, along with Prensa Latina, which was presented as an “international” representative despite being a Cuban state entity.
What detail sparked questions about the event being pre-recorded?
The time displayed on the watch of the moderator, Arleen Rodríguez Derivet, reportedly indicated a time around 5 p.m., which contradicted the official claim that the event was broadcast live that morning.
Given the questions raised about the authenticity of this event, what level of transparency is necessary for government communications to maintain public trust?
Related reading