Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing political headwinds following the resignation of his Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney. A Labour source stated that Starmer “would not be PM without Morgan,” and questioned whether he will remain in office for much longer.
Significance of McSweeney’s Departure
McSweeney’s exit is considered significant for several reasons. First, the Prime Minister heavily relied on McSweeney’s political instincts, to a greater extent than previous Prime Ministers relied on their own key advisors. Second, McSweeney played a central role in rebuilding the Labour Party after its losses in 2019. Third, his departure highlights existing challenges for Starmer and suggests he was attempting to appease critics.
The timing of McSweeney’s resignation has also caused internal turmoil. Sources initially indicated that no changes were planned, and cabinet ministers were reportedly shocked by the eventual decision.
What Happens Next?
The disruption caused by this change could be substantial, particularly given the government’s current struggles. Starmer’s critics now have a visible victory, and it remains to be seen how the Prime Minister will respond. Further changes within the government could follow, or that Starmer will attempt to rally support and maintain his current course.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Morgan McSweeney resign?
McSweeney resigned, taking “full responsibility” for advising the Prime Minister, though the specific details of that advice were not provided.
How reliant was Keir Starmer on Morgan McSweeney?
The Prime Minister “really, really relied” on McSweeney’s political instincts, more so than previous Prime Ministers relied on their key advisors.
What impact could this have on the Labour Party?
Losing McSweeney, who was central to rebuilding the Labour Party after 2019, shows how deep Starmer’s problems run and could lead to further disruption.
How will the Prime Minister address the challenges presented by the loss of his Chief of Staff?
