The Rise of Meeting-Based Phishing: How Cybercriminals Are Exploiting Our Trust
A concerning fresh trend is sweeping across the corporate landscape: phishing attacks disguised as everyday video conference invites. Attackers are leveraging platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet to deliver malicious payloads, specifically remote access software, directly onto employee devices. This isn’t just another phishing scam; it’s a sophisticated tactic exploiting our reliance on virtual meetings and the inherent trust placed in familiar platforms.
The Psychology Behind the Attack
Netskope Threat Labs, which has been closely tracking these campaigns, highlights two key factors driving their success: trust and urgency. Employees are more likely to click on a meeting invite, especially if it appears to reach from an executive or colleague. Busy schedules further reduce due diligence, making individuals susceptible to downloading files without fully assessing the risks. Attackers capitalize on this by simulating a sense of urgency, using timers, participant counts, or even fabricated audio cues to pressure victims into acting quickly.
The attacks are designed to bypass traditional security measures. Redirects to malicious domains are seamless, evading email filters. Even more concerning, the payloads themselves are often legitimate remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools – Datto RMM, LogMeIn Unattended, and ScreenConnect – which are commonly used by IT departments and therefore less likely to be flagged by security software.
How the Attack Unfolds: A Step-by-Step Breakdown
The process typically begins with a phishing email mimicking a standard internal meeting invite, often spoofing an executive’s name. Clicking the link leads to a convincing replica of the video conferencing platform. Victims are then prompted to download a “mandatory update” to address a supposed compatibility issue. This download, however, is the malicious payload disguised as a routine software patch.
Once installed, these RMM tools grant attackers full administrative remote access to the compromised system. This access allows them to view the screen, transfer files, and execute commands – all without triggering the alerts typically associated with malware. The potential consequences are severe, ranging from data exfiltration and network reconnaissance to widespread ransomware deployment.
Beyond Email: The Expanding Attack Surface
While email remains a primary vector, the threat is evolving. Attackers are increasingly adapting their methods to mirror the workflows of their targets, embedding threats within routine business actions. This makes detection significantly more challenging. The reliance on video conferencing as critical business infrastructure has created a reliable attack surface that threat actors are actively exploiting.
Defending Your Organization: A Layered Approach
Protecting against these attacks requires a multi-faceted strategy encompassing both technology and employee awareness.
Technical Safeguards
- Application Allowlisting: Strictly control which applications can execute on company devices, blocking unsanctioned RMM tools.
- Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs): Inspect traffic to known phishing domains and block RMM payloads before installation.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implement MFA across email and collaboration platforms to limit the damage from compromised accounts.
- Regular Software Updates: Keeping video conferencing applications up to date removes the pretext for fake update prompts.
Employee Training & Awareness
Security training must be updated to specifically address fake meeting invite scenarios. Employees should be taught to verify invites directly through the application or by contacting the sender via a known communication channel. They should too be instructed to never download software prompted by an email link.
Pro Tip: Hover over links in emails before clicking to preview the destination URL. Gaze for discrepancies or suspicious domain names.
The Future of UC Cyberthreats
The trend of embedding threats within trusted workflows is likely to continue. As organizations adopt new collaboration tools and remote work becomes more prevalent, attackers will adapt their tactics accordingly. Organizations relying on legacy detection tools or treating phishing training as a one-time exercise are particularly vulnerable.
Matching defenses to the current threat landscape requires layered controls, updated training, and behavioral monitoring working in concert. No single solution is sufficient. A proactive, adaptive security posture is essential to mitigate the risks posed by these evolving attacks.
FAQ
Q: What are RMM tools and why are they being exploited?
A: RMM tools are legitimate software used for remote system administration. Attackers exploit them because they are often pre-approved within organizations, allowing them to bypass security controls.
Q: How can I identify a fake meeting invite?
A: Look for suspicious sender addresses, grammatical errors, and a sense of urgency. Always verify the invite through the application itself or by contacting the sender directly.
Q: Is multi-factor authentication (MFA) effective against these attacks?
A: Yes, MFA can significantly limit the damage if an account is compromised, even if an employee clicks on a malicious link.
Did you know? Attackers are increasingly using typo-squatted domains – websites with URLs that are slightly different from legitimate ones – to host malicious downloads.
Reader Question: “Our company uses a lot of third-party vendors. How can we ensure they aren’t a source of these attacks?”
A: Implement strict vendor security assessments and require them to adhere to your security policies. Regularly review their access privileges and monitor their activity for suspicious behavior.
Aim for to learn more about protecting your organization from phishing attacks? Explore our other security resources or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest threat intelligence.
