Five members of the Traveller community have settled claims for defamation against Howth Railway Refreshment Rooms and its security company, Security Partners. The claims, heard in the Circuit Civil Court on Tuesday, involved allegations of being refused entry to the north Co Dublin restaurant despite having reservations.
Details of the Case
Barrister Dermot Francis Sheehan, representing the claimants, informed Judge Ken Connolly that the defamation claims against Howth Railway Refreshment Rooms had been settled. The specific amount of compensation was not disclosed in court.
The five complainants – Pat and Margaret Gavin, John and Kathleen McDonagh and Mary Reilly, all of Swords – had made reservations at the restaurant on April 9th, 2022. They alleged they were told at the door that their reservations were cancelled and that they were “not getting in tonight.”
The claimants asserted they felt humiliated and were portrayed as disreputable and dangerous in front of others. They argued that any defense of qualified privilege by the restaurant was undermined by malice due to their membership in the Traveller community.
Restaurant’s Defense
Howth Railway Refreshment Rooms stated they had issued written apologies to the five individuals in February 2023, but without admitting liability for defamation. The restaurant maintained that any concerning statements were made by a doorman only in the presence of the other members of their reservation party.
The judge struck out the claims with no order as to legal costs.
What Might Happen Next
It is possible the parties will continue to engage in private discussions regarding the terms of the settlement. It is also possible that this case could prompt further scrutiny of access policies at restaurants and other establishments. Further legal action is not indicated by the available information.
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the original claims about?
The original claims were for discrimination, which resulted in a payment of €900 to each claimant. Following this, the claimants pursued claims for defamation against the restaurant and its security company.
Where did the case take place?
The case was heard in the Circuit Civil Court, following initial proceedings in the District Court. The restaurant involved is located in north Co Dublin.
What was the outcome of the defamation claims?
The defamation claims were settled, but the amount of compensation was not disclosed in court. The judge struck out the claims with no order as to legal costs.
What factors contribute to the complexities of discrimination and defamation cases?
