Trump Administration Proposes $2 Billion U.S.-Run Global Health System After WHO Exit
Following the official withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) in January, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a significant investment – approximately $2 billion annually – to establish a U.S.-led alternative for global health initiatives. This move aims to replicate the capabilities previously accessed through the WHO, including crucial laboratory networks, rapid-response systems, and data-sharing infrastructure.
Replicating WHO Functions at a Higher Cost
The proposed system, as detailed in reports by The Washington Post, would essentially duplicate the functions performed by the WHO. Three administration officials familiar with the plan confirmed the effort is underway. While the U.S. Previously contributed an average of $680 million annually to the WHO through member dues and voluntary contributions, this new initiative would represent a roughly threefold increase in spending.
According to one official, the $2 billion in funding is intended to “build the systems and capacities to do what the WHO did for us.” But, the U.S. Has not paid its outstanding dues to the WHO – approximately $278 million for the 2024-25 period – and does not intend to do so.
Concerns About Reach and Information Access
Public health experts have voiced concerns that a U.S.-run system may not achieve the same level of global reach as the WHO. The WHO’s established relationships and access to information from countries like China and Russia – nations that do not typically share health data directly with the U.S. – are considered invaluable. Atul Gawande, former assistant administrator for global health at USAID, highlighted this point to The Washington Post.
Did you recognize? The U.S. Originally helped found the WHO and was often its largest contributor.
Historical Context: U.S. Withdrawal from the WHO
President Trump initially moved to withdraw the U.S. From the WHO in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, but this effort was reversed under the Biden administration. Upon returning to office, President Trump reinstated the withdrawal, citing concerns over “unfairly onerous payments” and the WHO’s handling of the pandemic. The official withdrawal took effect on January 22, 2026.
Implications for Global Health Security
The shift away from the WHO raises questions about the future of global health security. The WHO plays a critical role in coordinating international responses to outbreaks, setting health standards, and providing technical assistance to countries in need. A fragmented global health landscape could hinder efforts to prevent and control the spread of infectious diseases.
Pro Tip: Staying informed about global health initiatives is crucial for understanding potential risks and opportunities in a rapidly changing world.
FAQ
Q: Why did the U.S. Withdraw from the WHO?
A: The Trump administration cited concerns about the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived unfair financial contributions.
Q: How much will the proposed U.S.-run system cost?
A: The proposal estimates an annual cost of approximately $2 billion.
Q: Will the new system have the same reach as the WHO?
A: Experts express concerns that the U.S.-run system may not have the same access to information and relationships as the WHO, particularly with countries like China and Russia.
Q: Is the U.S. Paying its outstanding dues to the WHO?
A: No, the U.S. Does not plan to pay the approximately $278 million in outstanding dues.
Explore more articles on global health and U.S. Foreign policy to stay informed. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates and insights.
