David Ellison’s rocky box office history

David Ellison, CEO of Paramount Skydance, is locked in a high-stakes battle to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), a move that signals a potential reshaping of Hollywood. After an initial, unsolicited offer in September, Ellison has persistently pursued WBD, even launching a hostile tender offer and securing a waiver from Netflix, which had previously reached an agreement to acquire parts of WBD. This aggressive strategy underscores a broader trend: the consolidation of power within the entertainment industry.

Warner Bros. Was the second-highest grossing studio domestically in 2025, a significant draw for Ellison. The studio’s extensive library of intellectual property – including DC superheroes, Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, and Game of Thrones – represents a substantial asset. Paramount’s current franchise portfolio, while successful with properties like “Top Gun: Maverick” and the “Mission: Impossible” series, doesn’t quite match the breadth and established fanbase of WBD’s offerings.

According to Paul Dergarabedian, head of marketplace trends at Comscore, acquiring Warner Bros. Would “add tremendous horsepower both in terms of brand identity and revenue generating potential” to any portfolio.

Skydance’s success has been heavily reliant on the “Mission: Impossible” franchise, starring Tom Cruise. Six of Skydance’s highest-grossing films globally feature Cruise, with “Top Gun: Maverick” becoming the studio’s first and only billion-dollar film. However, beyond “Top Gun: Maverick,” only five Skydance films have exceeded $200 million domestically.

The recent “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning” generated $599 million globally, but with a reported production budget of $400 million, the film’s profitability is less certain when factoring in marketing costs and revenue sharing with theaters. This highlights a broader challenge for studios: maintaining profitability in an era of rising production budgets and shifting consumer habits.

Ellison’s $108.4 billion bid for all of WBD’s assets, including its TV networks (CNN, TBS, TNT), distinguishes it from Netflix’s offer, which focused primarily on the film studio and streaming assets. Ellison argues that Paramount’s offer is “better for Hollywood” and “pro-competitive,” aiming to preserve the legacy of the industry. This approach reflects a commitment to the traditional theatrical model, contrasting with Netflix’s earlier prioritization of streaming releases.

The Paramount-WBD saga is indicative of a larger trend toward consolidation in the entertainment industry. As streaming services compete for subscribers and theatrical releases face uncertainty, major players are seeking to acquire valuable intellectual property and expand their market share. This consolidation raises concerns about potential job losses, reduced competition, and a decrease in creative diversity, as highlighted by Hollywood guilds.

Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango, notes that Paramount is seeking to bolster its franchise portfolio, recognizing the importance of established brands in attracting audiences. However, simply possessing well-known franchises isn’t a guarantee of success; consistent box office performance remains crucial.

What is David Ellison trying to achieve by acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery?

Ellison aims to create a larger, more competitive entertainment company with a stronger portfolio of intellectual property and a broader reach in both theatrical and streaming markets.

Why is Warner Bros. Discovery such a desirable asset?

WBD possesses a vast library of valuable franchises, including DC Comics, Harry Potter, and Game of Thrones, making it an attractive target for acquisition.

How does Skydance’s box office track record compare to other studios?

Skydance has achieved significant success with the “Mission: Impossible” and “Top Gun” franchises, but its overall track record is less consistent than that of major studios like Disney or Warner Bros.

What are the potential consequences of increased consolidation in Hollywood?

Increased consolidation could lead to job losses, reduced competition, and a decrease in creative diversity within the entertainment industry.