Modern YORK – Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Recently concluded a two-day working visit to the United States, his sixth since assuming the presidency, marked by a speech at the United Nations and meetings with US officials and business leaders. The visit occurred amid protest rallies concerning corruption and immigration policies.
UN Focus: Peace and Security Council Bid
Marcos proclaimed the visit “very productive,” emphasizing efforts to promote peace amidst global tensions and to secure support for the Philippines’ bid for a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for the 2027–2028 term. He addressed the UN General Assembly, stressing the importance of the rule of law, multilateralism, and peaceful dispute resolution.
The President likewise delivered a statement at the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, stating that a nation’s progress is measured by the status and empowerment of women. He held talks with UN Secretary General António Guterres, reaffirming the Philippines’ commitment to multilateralism.
Economic Discussions and Investment
Alongside the UN engagements, Marcos met with business leaders, including representatives from the US Medical Glove Company, to discuss establishing a manufacturing facility in the Philippines. Discussions were also held with JP Morgan leaders regarding economic cooperation, global financial developments, and the impact of global tensions on oil prices and international markets. The impact of artificial intelligence on industries and labor markets was also a topic of discussion.
Protests and Concerns from Filipino Communities
The visit was met with protests from Filipino community organizations, who called for prioritization of the needs of local and overseas Filipinos. Protesters also voiced concerns about alleged collusion with the Trump administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They cited ongoing corruption issues in the Philippines, the plight of Filipino migrants facing deportation and medical neglect in the US, and the economic impact of conflict in the Middle East – specifically, rising oil prices – on the Philippines.
Protest leaders from Migrante USA and GABRIELA USA raised concerns about the situation of Filipino migrants in the U.S., challenging claims by Philippines Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Theresa Lazaro, that “things are a bit calm right now.” They highlighted the experiences of Filipina migrant women affected by the US crackdown on migrants and the war on Iran. Stories were shared of Tita Rebecca, a 70-year-old migrant deported without her family’s knowledge, and Alma Bowman, a Filipina-American migrant leader facing potential deportation.
GABRIELA USA noted that oil prices in the Philippines have increased by up to 20 pesos, impacting drivers of jeepneys, tricycles, and motorcycles. A migrant worker leader from Migrante Los Angeles stated that officials “always say there’s no money, no budget, but then they prioritize their personal interests,” suggesting that the trip to the UN was a misallocation of resources.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the primary focus of President Marcos Jr.’s visit to the United Nations?
The primary focus was to urge peace in conflict-affected regions, particularly the Middle East, and to rally support for the Philippines’ bid for a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council for the 2027–2028 term.
What concerns did protesters raise during the President’s visit?
Protesters raised concerns about corruption in the Philippines, the treatment of Filipino migrants in the US, the impact of the war in the Middle East on the Philippine economy, and alleged collusion with the Trump administration and ICE.
What economic discussions took place during the visit?
Discussions were held with executives from the US Medical Glove Company regarding a potential manufacturing facility in the Philippines, and with leaders from JP Morgan on economic cooperation, global financial developments, and the impact of artificial intelligence.
As the Philippines seeks a greater role on the international stage, how might these domestic concerns influence its foreign policy priorities?
