Woman gets jail for abusing sons, throwing boyfriend’s phone down five storeys

by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A 36-year-old Vietnamese woman and Singapore permanent resident was sentenced to prison on Wednesday (Apr 22) after pleading guilty to ill-treating her son and committing a rash act. The woman’s actions included the physical abuse of her children and throwing objects from a fifth-floor housing block.

Details of Child Abuse Case

The court heard that the woman had custody of her two sons, aged eight and nine, whom she shared with a 53-year-old Singaporean ex-boyfriend. In early September 2024, the older son soiled his pants after visiting a market to buy noodles.

While washing the boy in the shower, the woman became angry and hit his head with a showerhead. She then pushed his head against the wall multiple times, causing the boy to bleed profusely from cuts on his head.

Although the mother bandaged the injuries, the boy did not receive medical treatment. The children later informed their father they had been slapped, and video evidence subsequently revealed the woman hitting both sons with cardboard.

Did You Know? For the offence of ill-treating a child in her care, the woman could have faced a maximum penalty of up to eight years in jail, a fine of up to S$8,000, or both.

The Rash Act and False Allegations

On November 24, 2025, the woman’s boyfriend, a 55-year-old Singaporean, stayed overnight at her flat to fix various items. The following day, an argument erupted after the woman became upset while searching for her medicine.

The Rash Act and False Allegations
Singaporean Expert Insight Sentencing and Legal Consequences Deputy Public Prosecutor Chan Yi Cheng

During the dispute, the woman threw a water kettle and a standing fan onto the floor. After the boyfriend left the flat, he discovered that his phone and the standing fan had been thrown from the fifth floor onto the ground outside the block.

The incident was reported to the police by an unrelated man. During the initial investigation, the woman falsely claimed her boyfriend had thrown the items, alleging that he had been drinking and became violent.

Expert Insight: The prosecution’s emphasis on “killer litter” highlights the severe safety risks associated with high-rise dumping. When combined with the vulnerability of the child victim—described as “completely incapable of defending himself”—the court’s sentencing reflects a need to address both public safety and the protection of minors.

Sentencing and Legal Consequences

Deputy Public Prosecutor Chan Yi Cheng described the attack on the nine-year-old boy as “grossly disproportionate” and unwarranted. He also noted that the woman had abused her sons for several months before the discovery in late November 2024.

Woman in jail on child abuse charges assualted by other inmates

The prosecution sought 18 months’ jail for the child abuse and 12 weeks’ jail for the rash act. It was also noted that the woman had previously been sentenced to six weeks’ jail in August 2025 for the same offence.

The woman was ultimately sentenced to 15 months and 12 weeks’ jail. For the rash act endangering life or personal safety, the maximum potential penalty was six months’ jail, a S$2,500 fine, or both.

Potential Future Implications

Given the woman’s history of similar offences and the nature of the child abuse, she may face continued supervision upon her release. The custody arrangements for the sons could also be subject to further review to ensure their safety.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final sentence handed to the woman?

The woman was sentenced to 15 months and 12 weeks’ jail.

Frequently Asked Questions
Although Frequently Asked Questions What

Why did the prosecutor describe the abuse as “grossly disproportionate”?

The prosecutor stated that the nine-year-old boy was vulnerable and much smaller than his mother, making him completely incapable of defending himself against an unwarranted attack.

How did the authorities prove the woman threw the items from the block?

Although the woman initially claimed her boyfriend threw the items, she changed her account and admitted to the act after being confronted with photos of the thrown items.

Do you believe stricter penalties for high-rise littering are necessary to ensure public safety?

You may also like

Leave a Comment