– Det fungerer ikke lenger

The End of “Cheap Security”: Why Europe is at a Geopolitical Crossroads

For decades, the European security architecture was built on a comfortable, if precarious, foundation. It was an era of what former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen calls “cheap security”—a reliance on the United States to provide the heavy lifting of conventional defense while Europe focused on economic integration and soft power.

However, the wind is shifting. With increasing volatility in U.S. Foreign policy and a perceived erosion of commitment to NATO’s Article 5—the “one for all, all for one” principle—the assumption that the U.S. Will always be the guarantor of European peace is vanishing.

We are witnessing a fundamental transition toward European strategic autonomy. The question is no longer if Europe should stand on its own feet, but how it will do so without triggering a total collapse of the transatlantic bond.

Beyond NATO: The Blueprint for a European Defense Coalition

The current trajectory suggests that NATO, as we know it, may be dissolving. To prevent a security vacuum, experts are proposing a new, leaner and more committed European defense alliance. This wouldn’t necessarily replace NATO but would act as a sovereign pillar capable of operating independently of Washington.

The 5% Mandate: A New Standard for Sovereignty

For years, the 2% GDP spending target has been a point of contention between the U.S. And its European allies. However, in a world where Europe must handle its own conventional defense, 2% is no longer sufficient.

The proposed shift toward a 5% GDP defense spending requirement represents a radical departure from post-Cold War austerity. Such a move would require a massive reallocation of national budgets, shifting funds from social services or infrastructure toward military modernization and industrial capacity.

The “Core Four” and the Role of Ukraine

Any viable European alliance requires a leadership engine. The likely candidates are the “Core Four”: Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy. These nations possess the industrial base and military reach to organize a continental shield.

Crucially, this new architecture would see Ukraine not just as a partner, but as a full-fledged member. Ukraine has evolved into a formidable military power with rapid innovation in drone warfare and munitions. Integrating Ukraine transforms the country from a “security consumer” into a “security provider,” serving as the primary bulwark against Russian aggression.

The Danger of the “Strong Man” Dependency

The shift toward autonomy is a reaction to a global trend: the rise of personalized power. Whether it is the unpredictability of Donald Trump, the aggression of Vladimir Putin, or the strategic calculations of Xi Jinping, Europe has found itself too dependent on the whims of “strong men.”

Relying on the personal relationship between leaders rather than institutional guarantees is a high-risk strategy. By reducing dependency on U.S. Political cycles, Europe can insulate its security from the volatility of American domestic elections.

Balancing the Nuclear Umbrella with Conventional Power

It is important to distinguish between conventional defense and strategic deterrence. Even the most ardent supporters of European autonomy acknowledge that the U.S. Nuclear umbrella remains the ultimate guarantee against existential threats.

The goal is a hybrid model: Europe takes full ownership of its borders, troop deployments, and conventional weaponry, while maintaining a strategic link to the U.S. For nuclear deterrence. This allows Europe to be “autonomous but not isolated.”

For further reading on how this impacts global trade, see our analysis on the shift toward regional economic blocs or visit the official NATO portal for current treaty obligations.

Frequently Asked Questions