A Philippine domestic worker resigned after just two days of employment in Hong Kong, citing a recent earthquake in her hometown as the reason, according to a social media post by her employer. The worker, who originated from Davao City in southern Mindanao, reportedly requested immediate repatriation, leading to a financial loss for the employer, who estimated the cost at HK$20,000.
The employer, identified as a woman in her 40s, shared screenshots of a WhatsApp conversation on the social media platform Threads, detailing the worker’s abrupt departure. The worker stated, “Davao is always earthquake and my house more crack not safety, I need to fix my house can I home Phill.” The employer questioned the timing, noting the worker had only been employed for two days before requesting to leave.
According to the employer’s post, the worker admitted she could not afford to pay the one-month notice period. The employer reportedly waived the payment and covered the cost of the worker’s return flight to the Philippines. The employer expressed frustration, writing, “I have no worker luck,” and described the situation as akin to a “Hong Kong 3-day 2-night trip.”
What triggered the worker’s resignation?
The worker cited concerns about her home in Davao City, which she claimed was damaged by recent earthquakes. Davao City, located in the southeastern part of Mindanao, is no stranger to seismic activity. However, the employer disputed the urgency of the situation, pointing out the worker had only been employed for two days before making the request.
What are the legal implications for employers?
Under Hong Kong labor laws, domestic workers are typically required to provide a one-month notice period before terminating their employment. Employers may seek compensation if the worker fails to comply. However, the employer in this case chose not to pursue the payment, instead covering the worker’s return flight. This decision has sparked debate among other employers, who question whether the worker’s request was genuine or a convenient excuse.
What does this case reveal about employer-employee dynamics?
The incident highlights the challenges faced by employers in Hong Kong when dealing with domestic workers from overseas. The employer’s post drew mixed reactions, with some sympathizing with the worker’s situation and others criticizing her for what they perceived as a lack of commitment. Experienced employers shared advice on how to assess a worker’s intentions, such as examining the contents of their luggage to determine if they plan to stay long-term.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason given for the worker’s resignation? The worker claimed her home in Davao City was damaged by recent earthquakes and needed repairs.
What financial loss did the employer incur? The employer estimated the loss at HK$20,000, including the cost of the worker’s return flight and the waived notice period.
What advice do experienced employers offer? Some suggest examining a worker’s luggage to assess their commitment, while others recommend setting clear expectations about notice periods and consequences for early termination.
How might this situation affect future employer-employee relationships in Hong Kong?
Related reading