The Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE) has scheduled a series of virtual hearings for Friday, June 19, at 10:30 a.m. to resolve 32 appeals filed by the political party Juntos por el Perú (JP). The appeals seek to invalidate 2,398 polling stations in Lima and the United States, as well as to recover votes in various provinces by challenging previously observed electoral tallies.
Did You Know? The Jurado Electoral Especial (JEE) of Lima Centro 1 and Lima Centro 2 previously declared the party’s requests for nullity inadmissible because Juntos por el Perú failed to pay the required electoral fee of S/ 1,375 for each contested polling station.
Grounds for the Lima and International Appeals
Carlos Zafra Flores, legal representative for Juntos por el Perú, argues that the party’s right to effective judicial protection was violated when its initial nullity requests were rejected. Zafra contends that the contested polling stations in districts such as Barranco, Ate, Carabayllo, and others showed a repetitive pattern of results favoring presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori of Fuerza Popular. While the initial request for the 647 polling stations in the United States was declared inadmissible, the JNE has granted the appeal for a hearing to review the case on Friday.
Disputes Over Observed Electoral Records
Beyond the nullity requests, Juntos por el Perú is challenging resolutions from various Jurado Electoral Especial (JEE) offices regarding observed records. The party seeks to revoke these decisions, arguing that a simple cotejo (comparison of records) is insufficient to ensure the accuracy of the vote count. For example, regarding an electoral record in Lima Norte 3, Zafra argued that a resolution based solely on a cotejo does not guarantee that the scrutiny reflects the true will of the voter. Similar appeals have been filed in Coronel Portillo, Santa, Huancavelica, and Tumbes, where the party disputes the classification of null votes and requests a full recount of ballots.
Potential Outcomes and Expert Analysis
Expert Silvia Guevara suggests that the JNE is unlikely to rule in favor of Juntos por el Perú regarding the invalidation of 1,751 polling stations in Lima. Guevara notes that granting the request would contradict the JNE’s own established criteria and could set a problematic precedent for future regional and municipal elections. Analyst Luis Nunes adds that the JNE should maintain the initial decisions of the JEE offices, characterizing the party’s actions as dilatory maneuvers intended to extend the timeline for final results.
Expert Insight: The legal tension here centers on the distinction between a formal “cotejo” and a full “recuento” of votes. While the party argues that a recount is a more effective mechanism for verifying results, the electoral authorities are currently balancing these requests against the need for finality and adherence to established procedural costs and deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary objective of the JNE hearings on June 19?
The JNE aims to resolve 32 appeals filed by Juntos por el Perú, which seek to invalidate nearly 2,400 polling stations and challenge the classification of votes in specific electoral records.
Why were the initial nullity requests rejected by the JEE?
The requests were declared inadmissible by the Lima Centro 1 and Lima Centro 2 offices because the party did not attach the required payment receipts for the S/ 1,375 fee per impugned polling station.
How has the party responded to allegations regarding the funding of these appeals?
Roy Mendoza, a legal representative for Juntos por el Perú, stated that all funds used for the appeal process will be fully transparent and reported to the ONPE.
Do you believe the current electoral review process provides sufficient clarity for voters regarding the final results?
Related reading