Portugal secured a 2-1 victory over Croatia to advance to the 2026 World Cup Round of 16 after a controversial VAR decision disallowed a late Josko Gvardiol goal. Referee Espen Eskas overturned the goal in the 13th minute of stoppage time, citing sensor data that indicated Igor Matanović touched the ball, which placed Mario Pasalić in an offside position.
What caused the disallowed goal in the Portugal vs. Croatia match?
The controversy occurred during a high-intensity sequence in the final moments of the match in Toronto. Following a cross from Ivan Perišić, the ball reached Mario Pasalić, who deflected it toward Josko Gvardiol for what appeared to be an equalizer.
However, the referee halted play following a signal from the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system. According to Roman Kołtoń of Prawda Futbolu, the sequence involved a touch from Igor Matanović, which caused the ball to fall to Renato Veiga, and subsequently to Pasalić. Because of the Matanović contact, Pasalić was ruled to be in an offside position.
The match saw an unusually long period of stoppage time, totaling nearly 19 minutes in the second half, according to Kołtoń.
The modern footballs used in major tournaments are equipped with sensors that transmit data every 2 milliseconds—or 500 times per second—to assist officials with precise contact detection.
How does sensor technology detect player contact?
The decision relied on high-frequency data provided by sensors embedded within the ball. Jan Micygiewicz of TVP Sport explained that the technology sends data every 2 milliseconds, allowing officials to see a graph of contact points. Micygiewicz noted that this same technology was used to validate a fourth goal for Sweden in their match against Tunisia.
Referee Espen Eskas reviewed the sequence on the pitch-side monitor to confirm the timing of the contact. This technological integration aims to provide a definitive answer in “offside by a hair” scenarios, a term used by journalist Jakub Olkiewicz to describe the precision of the ruling.
Why is the accuracy of VAR technology being debated?
While the technology is intended to provide certainty, the Portugal-Croatia match has highlighted a growing divide between technical data and visual perception. Experts and commentators offered conflicting views on the reliability of the sensor-based ruling.
A comparison of expert reactions shows a significant split in opinion:
- Support for Technology: Jan Micygiewicz (TVP Sport) defended the use of the 2ms data interval, while Rafał Rostkowski, a football refereeing expert, supported Eskas’s decision.
- Skepticism of Technology: Artur Kwiatkowski (Canal+ Sport) criticized the decision, calling the technology “tragic” and claiming the data graphs did not clearly show a touch. Similarly, commentator Rafał Wolski stated that the contact was “hard to discern.”
- Observational Discrepancies: Robert Błoński of sport.tvp.pl noted a discrepancy in the replay, observing that while a Portuguese player appeared to touch the ball with his back, the Croatian player did not appear to make contact with his head.
Dariusz Maruszczak, writing for fcbarca.com, expressed uncertainty regarding whether the touch actually occurred, noting that if the VAR did not catch the contact reliably, the Croatian team had been “cheated.”
When watching VAR reviews, look for the “contact graph” often shown on broadcasts. This visualizes the 500-per-second data points that officials use to determine if a player’s body or head actually met the ball.
How did the players and media react to the decision?
The emotional weight of the decision was visible in the reactions of the players. Michał Pol from Kanał Sportowy reported that both Cristiano Ronaldo and Luka Modrić were left “devastated” by the disallowed goal and the final result.
The match was described by Żelisław Żyżyński of Canal+ Sport as a “rollercoaster of emotions,” characterizing the atmosphere in Toronto as intense. The high-stakes nature of the 2026 World Cup advancement added to the drama of the 90+13 minute intervention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Josko Gvardiol’s goal disallowed?
The goal was disallowed because VAR and ball sensors indicated that Igor Matanović touched the ball before it reached Mario Pasalić, who was in an offside position.
Who was the referee for the Portugal vs. Croatia match?
The match was officiated by referee Espen Eskas.
How often does the football sensor send data?
According to Jan Micygiewicz, the sensors in the ball send data every 2 milliseconds, which equates to 500 times per second.
What do you think about the use of high-frequency sensors in football? Is technology helping or hurting the spirit of the game? Let us know in the comments below!
Stay updated on the latest World Cup developments by subscribing to our newsletter.
