Brazil Fears US Military Force on Its Territory

Brazil faces a potential risk of United States military intervention on its territory following Washington’s decision to classify two Brazilian criminal organizations, Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) and Comando Vermelho (CV), as terrorist groups. Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira warned in a letter to Parliament that this unilateral classification could justify extraterritorial actions against Brazilian institutions and lead to the use of U.S. military force.

Why does the U.S. terrorist designation spark sovereignty fears in Brazil?

The Brazilian government views the U.S. classification of domestic criminal groups as a direct threat to national sovereignty. According to a letter addressed to Parliament obtained by AFP, Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira stated that this “unilateral classification” could be used to justify actions taken outside of Brazil’s legal jurisdiction.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has actively opposed the designation. The Brazilian administration argues that the U.S. move grants Washington the authority to conduct operations against the leaders of these groups anywhere in the world, potentially bypassing Brazilian law and territory.

The fear is not merely diplomatic. Vieira specifically cited a “risk of recourse to U.S. military force against national territory.” This tension highlights a growing trend where the line between international counter-terrorism and domestic law enforcement becomes increasingly blurred.

Which Brazilian criminal groups are involved in the dispute?

In May, the United States government designated the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) and the Comando Vermelho (CV) as terrorist organizations. The U.S. government justified this decision by claiming these groups maintain “illicit networks” that extend well beyond Brazil’s borders.

According to U.S. officials, these organizations are involved in narcotrafic and various other illegal revenue streams. These activities are concentrated in Brazil’s popular neighborhoods.

While the U.S. sees these groups as global security threats, the Brazilian government maintains that these are matters of domestic criminal justice rather than international terrorism.

How does the U.S. approach to criminal groups differ by region?

This trend is visible across the Americas, though the outcomes vary by country.

Since returning to the White House in 2025, Donald Trump has designated several other groups as terrorists, including the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico and the Tren de Aragua in Venezuela. The U.S. has already taken kinetic action in these regions:

• Venezuela: Washington has launched lethal attacks against the Tren de Aragua.
• Caribbean and Pacific: The U.S. has conducted strikes against vessels designated as those of drug traffickers, without providing evidence.

This creates a stark contrast in how the U.S. interacts with its neighbors. In Mexico and Venezuela, the U.S. has moved toward direct or indirect military engagement, a path that Brazil is now attempting to block through diplomatic warnings.

Will security tensions impact Brazil-U.S. trade?

The friction between Brasília and Washington is not limited to security and terrorism. Economic tensions are mounting as the Trump administration investigates potential unfair trade practices by Brazil. The U.S. is currently deciding whether to impose 25% surtaxes on various Brazilian products.

A final decision on these tariffs is expected by July 15. The Brazilian government has officially rejected the accusations of unfair trade, adding a layer of economic uncertainty to an already volatile security relationship.

The intersection of these two issues—the terrorist designation and the potential trade tariffs—suggests a period of heightened bilateral tension. Domestic politics in Brazil are also playing a role; the right-wing opposition has welcomed the U.S. decision, accusing the government of laxisme ahead of the October presidential elections.

Frequently Asked Questions

Stay informed on shifting global security policies and international trade. Subscribe to our newsletter for deep-dive analyses and breaking updates.

What do you think about the U.S. use of terrorist designations for criminal cartels? Let us know in the comments below.