Marine Le Pen remains eligible to run in the next French presidential election after a Paris appeals court ruling on July 7. Although the court upheld her conviction for the fraudulent use of European Parliament funds, it modified her period of political ineligibility, allowing her to bypass a ban that would have otherwise prevented her candidacy. Le Pen has announced her intent to appeal to the Court of Cassation, a move that suspends the immediate effects of the current ruling.
How the Court Ruling Impacts the Presidential Race
The Paris Court of Appeal found the National Rally (RN) parliamentary leader guilty of misusing over four million euros in European Parliament funds between 2004 and 2016. The court sentenced Le Pen to three years in prison—one year to be served under house arrest with an electronic bracelet—and a 100,000-euro fine.
Crucially, the judges adjusted the terms of her ineligibility. While the initial March 31, 2025 conviction imposed a five-year ban on holding public office, the appeals court reduced the effective period to 15 months. Because the clock on this prohibition began ticking on March 31 of last year, the term will expire well before the scheduled presidential election in April of next year. This legal adjustment clears the path for Le Pen to challenge the successor of Emmanuel Macron.
Le Pen previously stated she would not launch a presidential campaign while wearing an electronic monitoring bracelet. Following the court’s decision, she declared on TF1: “I will, therefore, campaign without an electronic bracelet.”
The Legal Strategy: Appeal to the Court of Cassation
Le Pen’s defense team plans to take the case to the Court of Cassation, France’s highest judicial body. According to Le Pen, this appeal effectively “suspends the effects of the judgment” from the appeals court. During the appellate process, which began on January 13, Le Pen maintained her innocence, arguing that the hiring of assistants was a legitimate practice and claiming the European Parliament failed to provide proper oversight.
The case centers on the allegation that funds intended for parliamentary assistance were diverted to support National Rally operations. Le Pen has consistently framed the legal proceedings as a hurdle to be overcome with “a spirit of hope,” resisting the characterization of her actions as an infraction.
Candidate Performance: Le Pen vs. Jordan Bardella
Public opinion polls show Le Pen remains a formidable contender, though her legal troubles have introduced strategic complications for the National Rally. Data from the Ifop-Fiducial poll in June indicates Le Pen commands approximately 32% of voter intentions in the first round. This significantly outpaces centrist rival Édouard Philippe, who polls between 19% and 21%, and radical-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who sits between 13% and 15%.
However, the party has faced a dilemma regarding internal preference. According to Frédéric Dabi, director-general of Ifop, Jordan Bardella has consistently polled better than Le Pen, often reaching 35% to 37% in voter surveys. Dabi suggests these numbers reflect voter anticipation of a potential scenario where Le Pen might be disqualified. With the current court ruling, the party now faces the task of consolidating support behind Le Pen as the confirmed candidate.
Follow TF1 Info and major French political analysis outlets for real-time updates on the Court of Cassation’s docket, as the final ruling will determine if the current legal status remains permanent.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Marine Le Pen legally barred from running for president?
No. While the court upheld her conviction, the modified ineligibility period of 15 months will conclude before the April election of next year, making her eligible to run.
What was the core of the fraud case against Le Pen?
The case concerned the misuse of over four million euros in European Parliament funds to pay for “fake” assistants who worked for the National Rally rather than for parliamentary duties between 2004 and 2016.
What happens to the sentence while the appeal is pending?
According to Le Pen, the appeal to the Court of Cassation suspends the effects of the appeals court’s judgment, meaning the prison sentence and the electronic monitoring requirements are currently on hold.
Stay informed on the shifting political landscape in France. Subscribe to our newsletter for updates on the presidential race and legal developments affecting the National Rally.
Keep reading