U.S. Criticizes Taiwan’s Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile for Late Reporting & Lack of Transparency-Missing Nuclear State Standards

China has launched a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), specifically identified by United News Network as a “Julang-2” (Ju Long-2), sparking criticism from the U.S. regarding transparency. The U.S. government stated the notification of the launch arrived too late and lacked sufficient detail to meet the standards of a major nuclear-armed state, according to Yahoo News.

Why is China expanding its “Nuclear Triad” capabilities?

China is pursuing a “nuclear triad”—the ability to launch nuclear weapons from land, air, and sea. According to the Central News Agency (CNA), analyst Xue Ruifú notes that enhancing submarine-launched capabilities specifically targets the United States by increasing China’s second-strike survivability. Because submarines are harder to detect than land-based silos, they ensure a retaliatory capability if a first strike occurs.

This shift moves China from a minimum deterrence posture toward a more robust strategic posture. The use of the Julang-2 missile demonstrates a commitment to maintaining a credible sea-based deterrent that can operate independently of mainland command centers.

Did you know? A “nuclear triad” is considered the gold standard of strategic deterrence because it forces an adversary to monitor three different domains simultaneously, making a total preemptive strike nearly impossible.

How are the U.S. and its allies reacting to these launches?

The response from Washington is focused on the lack of communication. Yahoo News reports that U.S. officials criticized the “opaque” nature of the launch, arguing that the late notification increases the risk of miscalculation in the Pacific. This lack of transparency is framed as a failure to adhere to the norms expected of a primary nuclear power.

How are the U.S. and its allies reacting to these launches?

Beyond the U.S., regional stability is a primary concern. RTI reports that the foreign ministers of the U.S., Japan, and South Korea have emphasized the importance of maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait. These three nations are coordinating closely to monitor the situation surrounding Taiwan, as China’s naval expansion often overlaps with its territorial claims in the region.

What is the “Taiwan Shield” and how does it counter SLBMs?

The threat of submarine-launched missiles has prompted defensive upgrades in the region. Public Television Service (PTS) reports that Taiwan is developing a “Taiwan Shield” air defense network. This system is specifically designed to counter the threat posed by Chinese submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

BREAKING: China Launches Ballistic Missile From Nuclear Submarine

While traditional radar systems struggle to detect missiles launched from underwater, the “Taiwan Shield” aims to integrate multi-layered detection and interception capabilities to mitigate the risk of a sudden, sea-based strike.

Pro Tip: When tracking regional security trends, watch for “interoperability” agreements between the U.S., Japan, and South Korea. These agreements often signal a shift from individual defense to a collective monitoring network.

Comparing the perspectives on China’s missile tests

Different reporting outlets highlight distinct aspects of this escalation:

Comparing the perspectives on China's missile tests
  • The Strategic View: CNA focuses on the “nuclear triad” and the direct challenge to U.S. hegemony.
  • The Diplomatic View: Yahoo News emphasizes the breach of international norms regarding notification and transparency.
  • The Tactical View: PTS focuses on the immediate physical threat to Taiwan and the necessity of the “Taiwan Shield” air defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Julang-2 missile?
It is a Chinese submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) capable of carrying nuclear warheads, according to United News Network.

Why does the U.S. care about the notification time?
According to Yahoo News, late notifications increase the risk of accidental escalation or misinterpretation of a test as an actual attack.

Who is coordinating to protect the Taiwan Strait?
The foreign ministers of the U.S., Japan, and South Korea are working together to maintain regional peace, as reported by RTI.


What do you think about the shift toward a nuclear triad in East Asia? Does increased transparency reduce the risk of war, or does it simply provide a roadmap for adversaries? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more deep dives into global security.

Leave a Comment