China’s economic rise depends on the openness of the U.S.-led international order, even as Beijing seeks to supplant it. According to analysis of current trade dynamics, China’s reliance on Western markets to absorb industrial overcapacity creates a paradox where its pursuit of global dominance may trigger the very protectionism that undermines its prosperity.
The Paradox of China’s Industrial Dominance
Beijing has successfully leveraged Western liberal systems to transform into a military and economic superpower. Since Deng Xiaoping’s “reform and opening” in the late 1970s, China used access to global markets to build its foundation. However, this growth has created a systemic imbalance.
Economist Michael Pettis argues that suppressed domestic consumption and excess savings have forced China to export both goods and capital. Historically, the United States absorbed these surpluses through trade deficits. Now, as the U.S. reduces its dependence on Chinese imports, Beijing is diverting this excess production toward Europe.
Did you know? The phrase “the East is Rising, the West is declining” (东升西降) became a mantra for Chinese leadership, gaining intellectual traction after the 2007–08 global financial crisis.
European Vulnerability and the ‘Dumping Ground’ Effect
The European Union is currently struggling to maintain a unified strategy toward Beijing. Because the eurozone contains both export-driven economies like Germany and import-dependent nations in Southern Europe, China can exploit these internal political divisions.
The European Commission has officially labeled the current state of EU-China economic relations as “unsustainable.” Analysts Enrico Fardella and Michael Pettis suggest the EU remains structurally vulnerable to absorbing China’s imbalances. This risks “deindustrialization” across Europe, which could fuel nationalist and far-right political movements.
Comparison: Regional Responses to Chinese Overcapacity
| Region | Primary Strategy | Key Action |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Bipartisan De-risking | Reducing supply chain dependence |
| European Union | Systemic Management | Evaluating coordinated trade measures |
| Global South | Defensive Screening | India expanding trade-defense tools |
The ‘American Kill Line’ and the Narrative of Decline
Within China, a perception of Western collapse is spreading through social media. Since late 2025, memes referring to the “American kill line”—the idea that the U.S. is one crisis away from total collapse—have gone viral. For young Chinese citizens facing a slowing economy, these narratives suggest that China’s problems are temporary while Western failures are structural.
This worldview is supported by scholars like Jin Canrong of Renmin University, who asserts that the world’s center of gravity is shifting from the transatlantic region toward Asia. This narrative has gained traction in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Zimbabwe, where elites view Western liberalism as intrusive or exhausted.
The Necessity of a New Economic Model
To avoid a “vicious trade war,” Beijing may need to fundamentally reconfigure its growth model. Current efforts to strengthen domestic demand are described as modest and insufficient. A true shift would require transferring income from state-favored sectors and local governments directly to households.
Such a move would mean “socializing prosperity” rather than production. By boosting household consumption, China could reduce its reliance on foreign markets and ease tensions with the U.S. and EU. However, this path is politically costly for the Chinese Communist Party, as it requires reducing the resources controlled by the state apparatus.
Pro Tip for Investors: Monitor “de-risking” policies in the EU and U.S. as primary indicators of future trade volatility. The shift from “engagement” to “containment” often precedes new tariff regimes in high-tech and automotive sectors.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is China’s overcapacity a problem for the West?
According to European analysts, China produces more goods than its own citizens can consume. By exporting this surplus at low prices, Beijing can undermine Western industries, leading to higher unemployment and deindustrialization.
What is the Belt and Road Initiative’s role in this?
Launched in 2013, the initiative seeks to shift the international economy’s center of gravity away from U.S.-led institutions by creating a China-centered network of standards and supply chains.
Can China replace the U.S.-led international order?
The analysis suggests China has not yet constructed a comprehensive alternative order. Because its rise was enabled by the existing system, undermining that system may inadvertently erode the foundations of China’s own prosperity.
Join the Conversation
Do you believe the West can successfully “de-risk” without triggering a global recession? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for deeper geopolitical analysis.
Related reading
