The Irish arm of Deel Inc. has been ordered to pay €51,004.20 to a former senior sales manager, Tommi Wong, following a Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling. Adjudicator Jim O’Neill found the firm penalized Mr. Wong for taking parental leave, citing instances of discrimination, unfair performance management, and breaches of working time regulations.
The Ruling: Parental Leave Penalization
The WRC case centered on events occurring throughout 2025. According to the ruling, Mr. Wong was informed during a July 22 meeting that there “might be no role available” for him upon his return if he proceeded with his approved parental leave. Mr. Wong characterized this statement as a “threat.”
Adjudicator Jim O’Neill determined this constituted discrimination on the grounds of family status under the Employment Equality Act, awarding Mr. Wong €31,114.20, representing three months’ pay. Furthermore, the WRC found that upon his return from leave in October 2025, Mr. Wong faced “unfavourable treatment,” including a change in reporting lines, exclusion from standard work communications, and the implementation of a performance improvement plan (PIP). These actions resulted in an additional €14,360.40 award for penalization under the Parental Leave Act.
Did you know?
Under Irish employment law, employees are protected against penalization for exercising their right to statutory leave. This includes protection from dismissal, unfair treatment, or adverse changes to working conditions during or after a period of leave.
Operational Disputes and Wage Claims
Beyond the discrimination claims, the WRC addressed disputes regarding working conditions and pay. Mr. Wong provided evidence that he was required to complete daily sales income reports seven days a week in June 2025, necessitating work on Saturdays and Sundays. The WRC accepted this evidence, noting it was uncontested by the company.

As a result, the commission awarded Mr. Wong €3,500 for breaches of his rights to Sunday premium pay and weekly rest periods under the Organisation of Working Time Act 2005. A further €2,029.60 was awarded under the Payment of Wages Act regarding an unpaid pension contribution.
Company Defense and Legal Context
Deel Inc.’s legal representatives denied the claims of discrimination and penalization but opted not to call witnesses during the WRC proceedings. The company noted that Mr. Wong had secured a Circuit Court injunction in December 2025 under the Protected Disclosures Act. This injunction mandated the continuation of his employment, salary, and benefits pending the outcome of the WRC case.
The firm argued that correspondence sent by Mr. Wong in November 2025 did not constitute a protected disclosure, as it did not involve the reporting of wrongdoing. However, the adjudicator’s findings focused on the specific actions taken regarding the claimant’s leave and subsequent performance management.
Future Trends in Workplace Rights and Remote Management
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the significance of the “protected disclosure” mentioned in the case?
A protected disclosure, commonly known as whistleblowing, provides legal safeguards for employees who report wrongdoing. In this case, the respondent argued the claimant’s correspondence did not meet the legal threshold for such a disclosure.

Can an employer change an employee’s reporting line after they return from leave?
While employers have operational flexibility, the WRC found that in this specific instance, the change was perceived as a “diminution of his job” and was part of a broader pattern of unfavourable treatment linked to the employee’s exercise of statutory rights.
What does the WRC consider “penalisation” in this context?
The WRC defines penalisation as a range of unfavourable actions—such as PIPs, probation extensions, or exclusion from meetings—that are directly linked to an employee exercising their statutory entitlement to leave.
For more information on employment rights and updates on Irish labor law, subscribe to our weekly newsletter or explore our archive of workplace legal guides.
Worth a look
