Keir Starmer concluded his final Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, marking the end of his tenure with a session defined by uncharacteristic displays of cross-party civility. While the outgoing Prime Minister received a standing ovation from Labour, Liberal Democrat, and Reform MPs, Conservative members remained seated as he exited the chamber. The 45-minute session saw Starmer exchange warm tributes with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, a departure from the combative tone that has historically characterized their parliamentary exchanges.
Did You Know? During his final session, Keir Starmer expressed his intention to watch the England versus Argentina World Cup semi-final at 8 p.m. that evening, noting he hoped to attend the final in New York on Sunday.
Badenoch and Starmer’s Final Exchange
Kemi Badenoch, who has previously struggled in her PMQs performances, adopted a notably conciliatory tone during the session. She offered a tribute to Ann Widdecombe and extended well wishes to Starmer and his family. The exchange included light-hearted commentary on the nature of political betrayal and references to public figures such as Count Binface and Nigel Farage. Starmer, who appeared visibly moved at times while acknowledging his wife and children in the gallery, responded with similar warmth.
Cabinet Transitions and Future Leadership
The session highlighted significant uncertainty regarding the future of the Labour cabinet. Ed Miliband was observed standing behind the speaker’s chair, while speculation continues to swirl around the potential appointment of Shabana Mahmood as Chancellor under an incoming Andy Burnham administration. Despite Mahmood having no formal economic experience and having stated a preference to remain as Home Secretary, she is currently considered the frontrunner for the Treasury role. Meanwhile, senior figures like Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendall appeared visibly emotional, reflecting the rapid shifts in political fortune that have defined the current administration.
Expert Insight: The transition of power within the Labour Party suggests a period of potential instability for current cabinet members. The contrast between the outward sentimentality of the farewell and the underlying tension regarding future appointments—such as the reported Treasury maneuvering—highlights the precarious nature of political loyalty as leadership changes hands.
Starmer’s Legacy and Political Standing
Reflecting on his time in office, Starmer acknowledged that he would miss the theatre of parliamentary life even if he did not miss the preparation required for PMQs. Analysts often view his tenure as a “mid-table” premiership; he was not a natural showman like Tony Blair or David Cameron, but was instead regarded as a steady, if seldom memorable, presence at the dispatch box. His term faced significant challenges, including policy U-turns, international conflicts, and the controversial appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States, which ultimately hindered his political standing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who remained seated during Keir Starmer’s final standing ovation?
The Conservative MPs remained seated while Labour, Liberal Democrat, and Reform MPs stood to applaud the outgoing Prime Minister.
What was the nature of the cabinet’s parting gift?
The cabinet presented Starmer with a carriage clock, a gesture described as the type of gift given to someone one does not know or care about deeply.
Who is currently favored to become the next Chancellor?
Shabana Mahmood is the firm favorite to be the Chancellor under a potential Andy Burnham leadership, despite her lack of economic experience and expressed desire to remain Home Secretary.
How do you interpret the significance of the Conservative party’s decision to remain seated during the final applause for the outgoing Prime Minister?
Related reading