The Indonesian public is utilizing social media platforms like Instagram and X to conduct digital surveillance on politicians displaying luxury goods, a phenomenon known as sousveillance. This citizen-led monitoring has sparked intense public scrutiny over wealth disparity, leading to the banning of the Instagram account @cabinetcouture_idn after it exposed the expensive lifestyles of government officials, including Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs Meutya Hafid.
The Rise of Sousveillance and Public Scrutiny in Indonesia
Luxury goods like Bottega, Lady Dior, Hermès Lindy, and Gucci Bamboo have long represented elite status. In Indonesia, however, these items frequently function as political objects amid widespread economic hardship, weakening currency, and rising unemployment. Citizens whose living conditions contrast sharply with those of wealthy officials are closely monitoring public figures funded by taxpayers’ money. This participatory monitoring from below is termed sousveillance, a concept coined by Steve Mann where ordinary people hold authorities accountable.
Internet users have actively documented these displays of wealth. For example, social media users highlighted that a minister’s wife carried a Lady Dior bag priced at IDR 60 million—nearly 12 times the minimum monthly wage in Jakarta. Similarly, online investigations previously targeted Meutya Hafid for carrying a Bottega Veneta Jodie Mini valued at roughly IDR 56 million. Additional officials facing public scrutiny for flexing luxury items include North Jakarta Public Works official Selvy Mandagi, Head of the Lampung Provincial Health Office Reihana, and Head of the Makassar Customs Office Andhi Pramono.
Censorship and the Digital Suppression of Accountability Accounts
The growing power of citizen investigations has triggered direct pushback from authorities. The Instagram account @cabinetcouture_idn, which actively exposed the extravagant lifestyles of political elites, was recently banned and made unavailable within Indonesian territory. This censorship highlights politicians’ anxiety over being watched by ordinary citizens.
Digital repression in Indonesia is reportedly intensifying under President Prabowo Subianto, whose military background has fueled public fears of rising authoritarianism. Law 11 of 2008 on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law has long been seen as a draconian law enabling state surveillance and restricting online freedom under the guise of security. The struggle over digital spaces now encompasses not just freedom of expression, but freedom of observation.
Precedents and Potential Consequences for Public Officials
Public monitoring of official wealth carries severe political and legal consequences, as demonstrated by past scandals. In 2023, former president Joko Widodo (Jokowi) directed civil servants and public officials to avoid lavish, hedonistic lifestyles following public outrage over Rafael Alun Trisambodo, a former tax official at the Ministry of Finance. Netizens had exposed the opulent lifestyle of Rafael’s son, Mario Dendy Satriyo, who showcased luxury vehicles like a Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, a Harley-Davidson motorcycle, and a Toyota Land Cruiser on social media. Public pressure forced the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to investigate Rafael, ultimately uncovering unexplained assets that led to his corruption conviction and imprisonment.
Following that controversy, ministries and government institutions introduced regulations promoting Pola Hidup Sederhana, or a simple lifestyle. However, recent displays of wealth suggest some officials have forgotten those lessons. As digital surveillance continues to evolve, social media has fundamentally transformed the relationship between citizens and political elites by enabling ordinary people to scrutinise, archive, and interpret the everyday lives of those in authority.
Worth a look