The Wizards of the Coast should look to the development model behind Fallout: New Vegas when planning the next installment of the Baldur’s Gate franchise, according to former Dragon Age lead Mark Darrah. Speaking in an interview with FRVR, Darrah stated that a new development studio would need access to Larian Studios’ existing technology and codebase to successfully preserve the complex design mechanics established in the award-winning third installment.
The Challenge of Inheriting a Complex RPG Engine
Nearly three years have passed since the debut of Baldur’s Gate 3, leaving intellectual property holder Wizards of the Coast to evaluate options for continuing the role-playing game series. Larian Studios has shifted its internal resources toward developing a new Divinity project, and no outside developer has yet matched the critical acclaim of the 2023 release. Darrah noted that handing the franchise to an entirely fresh team using a different game engine would likely cause the loss of intricate systems and minor design details painstakingly built by the Belgian studio over many years of refinement.
According to Darrah, any incoming team would face steep operational hurdles without direct access to the established design philosophy. “Jön valaki új, aki nem érti ezt az alapvető struktúrát, és valószínűleg nincs mögötte sokévnyi tapasztalat az ilyen típusú RPG-k elkészítésében,” Darrah explained during the interview, pointing out that even veteran studios like Owlcat Games—known for Pathfinder: Kingmaker, Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous, and Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader—would struggle to retain every mechanical nuance without the original technical framework.
Licensing the Divinity Engine as a Viable Path
To avoid losing the mechanical depth that defined the third game, Darrah suggested a strategy mirrored by Obsidian Entertainment during the creation of Fallout: New Vegas, where the studio relied on the existing Gamebryo motor and technological background established by Bethesda for Fallout 3. By licensing the Divinity Engine, an external team could build directly upon proven technical foundations rather than attempting to reverse-engineer a decade of specialized development experience.
Pro Tip: When evaluating studio handoffs for major franchises, industry veterans often look to shared-engine precedents like Fallout: New Vegas to maintain mechanical continuity while introducing fresh narrative perspectives.
“Győzzék meg a Lariant, hogy licencelje a Divinity Engine-t, majd röviden szólva bízzanak meg valakit egy hatalmas Baldur’s Gate 3-kiegészítő elkészítésével, és nevezzék el Baldur’s Gate 4-nek,” Darrah recommended to Wizards of the Coast as the most direct route to keeping player interest alive. Alternatively, the publisher could choose to break completely with the established formula, though the company continues to navigate millions of dollars in operating losses within its digital gaming division despite pushing multiple internal titles into production.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who suggested the Fallout: New Vegas model for Baldur’s Gate 4?
Mark Darrah, a former Dragon Age lead and a contributor to the first Baldur’s Gate, proposed the approach in an interview with FRVR.
Why does Mark Darrah believe a new engine would harm Baldur’s Gate 4?
He argues that a completely new team using a different engine would lose many intricate systems and design philosophies that Larian Studios spent years refining for the third installment.
What precedent did Darrah cite for this development model?
He pointed to Obsidian Entertainment’s development of Fallout: New Vegas, which utilized the existing Gamebryo motor and technological framework from Fallout 3.
What do you think? Should Wizards of the Coast license Larian’s engine for the next installment, or is it time for a radical redesign? Join the conversation in the comments below, share this article with your party, and subscribe to our newsletter for more RPG industry analysis.
Keep reading