International Fields Medal winners Hong Wang and Yu Deng have sparked intense online debate in China regarding academic freedom and brain drain, after state media highlighted their achievements while public forums resoundingly advised them not to return, according to reports by New Tang Dynasty Television on July 31, 2026.
The Fields Medal Wins and Shing-Tung Yau’s Recruitment Push
Dean Shing-Tung Yau initially called for the mathematicians to join domestic institutions during the World Chinese Mathematicians Congress held on January 3, 2026, where Wang and Deng jointly received the mathematics gold prize. When questioned by reporters about whether she plans to return to China for her career development, Wang stated that she had “not yet decided,” according to video footage circulating on Douyin.
Public Backlash and the ‘Don’t Return’ Movement on Social Media
Douyin comment sections featuring the recruitment footage accumulated over 20,000 predominantly warning responses telling the mathematicians to stay abroad. Users urged them to “keep moving forward and never look back” and advised them to follow the precedent of Yang Zhenning by conducting research abroad during their youth. On Zhihu, users questioned the safety of returning, asking why an elite scholar would risk facing domestic blacklists, administrative paranoia, or the confiscation of their passport.
Did you know? The World Chinese Mathematicians Congress is a gathering initiated by Shing-Tung Yau.
State Media Spin Versus Academic Realities
Following the awards, Chinese state media outlets attempted to frame the mathematicians' success as a product of domestic talent cultivation and systemic advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are Hong Wang and Yu Deng?
Hong Wang and Yu Deng are Chinese mathematicians who recently won the international Fields Medal and shared the gold prize at the World Chinese Mathematicians Congress.
Why are Chinese netizens advising the mathematicians not to return?
According to social media comments on platforms like Douyin and Zhihu, netizens cited concerns over restrictive domestic work environments, bureaucratic hurdles, and risks to academic freedom.
How did state media respond to the awards?
Chinese state media attempted to portray the win as a result of domestic educational advantages, contrasting with the recipients’ public attribution of their success to institutions in France and the US.
What are your thoughts on the balance between international talent recruitment and academic freedom? Leave a comment below or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates on global research trends.