Converting an engineering model of a Mars rover into a lunar rover could cost NASA between $723 million and $1.33 billion, according to an analysis published July 30 by The Planetary Society. The proposal, designated PROMISE or Polar Rover for Observation, Mapping and In-Situ Exploration, was announced June 30 by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman as a strategy to repurpose existing hardware for lunar base efforts. While agency leadership strongly rejected the billion-dollar price tag, independent cost estimates and space policy experts highlight significant technical and financial hurdles facing the mission.
PROMISE Rover Proposal and NASA Cost Debate
NASA introduced the PROMISE concept during a June event where Administrator Jared Isaacman stated that the agency planned to utilize engineering models built for the Curiosity and Perseverance Mars missions to support lunar south pole operations. According to Isaacman, adapting existing ground hardware would allow NASA to deliver capabilities quickly and efficiently to the lunar surface. However, an assessment conducted by Casey Dreier, chief of space policy for The Planetary Society, placed the total development, launch, and one-year operational cost between $723 million and $1.33 billion, with a projected readiness date in the early 2030s.
In a July 31 social media post, Isaacman pushed back against those projections, stating that if the mission costs even 20% of the low-end Planetary Society estimate, the agency will not fly it. Isaacman defended the initiative by arguing that failing to utilize existing hardware and decaying plutonium-238 fuel already paid for by taxpayers would be wasteful. “How much of this Pu-238 do you want to waste waiting for a mission that does not even exist?” he wrote on social media.
Technical Challenges in Converting Mars Engineering Models for Lunar Missions
The operational differences between Mars and the moon present substantial engineering hurdles for the PROMISE mission. According to The Planetary Society’s assessment, the target vehicle—derived from OPTIMISM, an engineering model of the Perseverance rover at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory—currently lacks space-rated components, a communications system, and flight-ready instruments.
Did you know?
NASA currently holds a single spare radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) fueled by plutonium-238. Using this power source for the PROMISE rover requires significant work to approve its use on the rover, lander modifications, and launch vehicle certifications, while simultaneously foreclosing its use on future outer solar system planetary science missions.
Impact on Planetary Science and Nuclear Power Availability
Diverting resources and scarce nuclear power supplies toward the PROMISE rover carries consequences for established science priorities. According to NASA’s planetary science division, budget issues and ongoing internal reorganizations have already forced the postponement of the call for proposals for the New Frontiers medium-class mission line to fiscal year 2027. Louise Prockter, director of NASA’s planetary science division, noted during a July 21 session of the NASA Exploration Science Forum that the agency is actively investigating the availability of nuclear power for candidate New Frontiers missions.
Dreier warned that assigning the sole spare RTG to PROMISE would rule out planetary science missions to the outer solar system for the foreseeable future and deprive Curiosity and Perseverance of a testbed, increasing operational risks for active Mars missions. Despite these concerns, Isaacman defended his approach, writing that “less debate and more frequent wins make it easier to advocate for more resources to do more science.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the PROMISE rover?
PROMISE stands for Polar Rover for Observation, Mapping and In-Situ Exploration. It is a proposed NASA lunar rover concept based on Earth-bound engineering models of the Curiosity and Perseverance Mars rovers.
How much is the PROMISE mission expected to cost?
According to an analysis by The Planetary Society, developing, launching, and operating PROMISE on the moon for one year is estimated to cost between $723 million and $1.33 billion. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman has rejected that estimate.
Why is the power supply a major concern for the mission?
The rover requires a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) powered by plutonium-238. NASA has only one remaining spare RTG, which is also needed for potential outer solar system missions under the New Frontiers program.
When might the PROMISE rover launch?
Independent space policy assessments indicate that the rover would likely not be ready for launch until the early 2030s.
What are your thoughts on repurposing Mars engineering models for lunar exploration? Do the potential savings outweigh the risks to other planetary science priorities? Leave a comment below to join the discussion.
Keep reading