Facial analysis services powered by artificial intelligence and looksmaxxing influencers are capitalizing on personal insecurities by selling algorithmic beauty reports and costly surgical recommendations, according to the article. Companies like Qoves charge users upwards of $300 to evaluate facial symmetry, skin health, and feature femininity against opaque metrics, raising alarms among psychologists over the impact on self-esteem and body dysmorphia.
The Rise of Algorithmic Beauty and Qoves Reports
Users upload selfies to online platforms to receive exhaustive breakdowns of their physical features, scoring everything from ear shape to facial harmony. Danielle, a 37-year-old tech worker in Colorado, spent $330 on a 30-page report from Qoves after struggling with financial insecurity and fading confidence during two years of unemployment. According to Danielle, the platform scored her features and recommended a rhinoplasty, lower blepharoplasty, canthopexy, chin implants, malarplasty, microblading, lash enhancements, and various facial fillers and Botox injections.
“I do believe that the standard I’ve acquired for what’s beautiful is impossible to achieve without spending thousands of dollars,” Danielle said, noting that she delayed cosmetic surgery to pay off credit card debt accrued while unemployed. Qoves utilizes marketing that highlights the “halo effect”—a documented psychological phenomenon where attractive people are perceived as smarter and more sociable—to pitch physical improvements as a pathway to career and financial security.
Looksmaxxing Culture and the Business of Insecurity
The aesthetics of bought beauty have surged on social media through the “looksmaxxing” subculture, where influencers claim attractiveness can be quantified and optimized through empirical scoring. While Qoves charges $150 for nonsurgical guidance and an optional $180 upgrade for surgical proposals, cheaper tools like Epica and Facemaxify utilize AI to score skin and facial components against proprietary metrics.
Did You Know? The “halo effect” is a documented psychological bias in which people assume physically attractive individuals possess other positive social and intellectual traits, such as better sociability and competence.
Epica primarily targets women with skin and makeup plans, directing users to affiliate links for cosmetics and grooming products. When asked about its methodology, Epica stated in an email to the Guardian that it is “unable to disclose proprietary information regarding our algorithmic methodologies, technical frameworks, or internal product development details.” Qoves did not respond to requests for comment.
Psychological Risks and the Limits of Science
Mental health experts warn that algorithmic facial grading poses severe risks to vulnerable populations. Dr. Tracy Vaillancourt, a psychology professor at the University of Ottawa whose research on bullying and mental health was cited in Qoves promotional videos, expressed concern over the platform’s psychological impact. “These sorts of things are so destructive to people who have body dysmorphia, dysphoria, a history of eating disorders and people with low self-esteem,” Vaillancourt said, noting that age restrictions are easily bypassed by minors.
Furthermore, academics question the scientific validity behind these platforms. Dr. Justin Mogilski, a psychology professor at the University of South Carolina Salkehatchie, whose research on masculine and feminine facial qualities was referenced by Qoves, noted that his findings do not generalize universally across global populations or cultures. “So, would I make suggestions based on our or anyone else’s data? I would not,” Mogilski said.
Dr. Mitch Brown, an assistant professor of psychological science at the University of Arkansas who studies the science of attraction, added that available literature is too heterogeneous to support population-wide generalizations or commercial recommendations. “I don’t think the science is anywhere clear enough to do that,” Brown said.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a facial analysis service?
Facial analysis services are online platforms that use AI and algorithms to evaluate user selfies, score facial symmetry and features, and provide personalized reports with recommendations for cosmetic procedures, skincare, and makeup.
What is looksmaxxing?
Looksmaxxing is an online subculture focused on maximizing physical attractiveness through targeted self-improvement, empirical scoring of facial features, and cosmetic enhancements to achieve ideal facial proportions.
Are the scientific claims behind these tools valid?
According to academic experts, the science behind these services is shaky. Researchers state that existing studies on physical attraction cannot support universal beauty standards or justify commercial recommendations for cosmetic surgery.
Join the Conversation
Have you encountered AI-powered beauty tools or looksmaxxing trends online? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below, or subscribe to our newsletter for more investigative reports on tech and society.
Keep reading