Oana Gheorghiu Slams AUR’s Attempt to Suspend Nicușor Dan as “PR Exercise

Vice Premier Oana Gheorghiu has characterized the initiative to suspend President Nicușor Dan as a “PR exercise,” stating on Digi24 that such a move would be detrimental to Romania during its current political crisis. Gheorghiu argued that the presidential institution requires respect and stability to build public trust, rather than becoming a focal point for new institutional conflicts.

Oana Gheorghiu Labels Suspension Push as Image Strategy

The push to suspend President Nicușor Dan is, according to Vice Premier Oana Gheorghiu, an action aimed at public image rather than a substantive legal or political necessity. Speaking live on Digi24, Gheorghiu stated, “I believe it is a PR exercise, because if someone really wants to do harm to this country, this is the thing they should do now, seriously, ask for the suspension of the president.”

This development follows a period of political volatility and government shifts. Gheorghiu emphasized that the presidential office must be respected to ensure the state’s stability, suggesting that triggering a suspension process would only deepen existing political instability.

Did you know? Un web designer din Republica Moldova este în spatele site-ului AUR pentru suspendarea președintelui.

Political Alliances and the Role of PSD and AUR

When questioned about whether the Social Democratic Party (PSD) might support the suspension efforts—given previous instances where PSD and AUR have collaborated—Gheorghiu remained non-committal. “Right now I don’t know… PSD and AUR have formed a common front at certain moments,” she told Digi24. She added that she hopes these parties exercise “a little wisdom” and prioritize the interests of the country.

The Vice Premier declined to speculate on whether Nicușor Dan is politically closer to the PSD or to the Pln and USR, stating she has not discussed these alignments with the president.

Critique of Presidential Silence During Censure Motion

Despite her support for the institution, Gheorghiu revealed a specific point of contention regarding the president’s conduct. She stated that she publicly reproached Nicușor Dan for failing to intervene before a motion of censure that targeted the reform of state-owned companies and their listing on the stock exchange.

CSM o reclamă pe Oana Gheorghiu pentru incitare la ură și violență. Declarațiile vicepremierului

Gheorghiu argued that a public statement from the president confirming that listing companies on the stock exchange is not a valid reason for a censure motion would have prevented “disinformation” from spreading in the public space. However, she noted that she cannot know all the constraints or information available to the president at any given time.

The Learning Curve of a Non-Traditional Politician

Addressing potential disappointments with the presidency, Gheorghiu defended the current trajectory of Nicușor Dan’s term. She noted that the president comes from a “different world” and that the beginning of a four-year mandate is naturally difficult for those entering the political sphere from outside traditional party structures.

Gheorghiu mentioned that her only direct meeting with the president took place in Brussels, where the conversation focused on digitalization. She maintained that the president is attempting to find the best solutions for Romania.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is there a push to suspend Nicușor Dan?

The initiative has emerged amidst a broader political crisis and government changes, with efforts including a dedicated website launched by AUR-affiliated interests.

What is Oana Gheorghiu’s position on the suspension?

The Vice Premier views the move as a “PR exercise” and believes it would be harmful to the country’s stability to transform the presidency into a new institutional conflict.

What specific criticism did the Vice Premier level against the President?

Gheorghiu criticized the president for not speaking out against disinformation regarding the listing of state companies on the stock exchange prior to a motion of censure.

Join the conversation: Do you believe institutional stability should take precedence over political accountability in the current climate? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more political analysis.

Leave a Comment