The Trump administration plans to break ground near Washington, D.C.’s National Mall on a proposed 250-foot structure known as the Great Triumphal Arch and Military Observation Deck, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. Excavation work is scheduled to begin over a two-week period despite the project lacking final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission and awaiting federally mandated reviews regarding historic preservation and aviation safety.
Excavation Plans and Legal Challenges
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced on social media that excavation work necessary for the structure will start soon. In response to the announcement, plaintiffs including an architectural historian and three Vietnam War veterans working with the nonprofit Public Citizen asked a judge for a 14-day restraining order on Friday. According to attorney Nicolas Sansone, the plaintiffs want to prevent the administration from taking any steps to construct or facilitate construction on Memorial Circle, a traffic island connecting D.C. to Arlington, Virginia.
Government lawyers submitted a legal filing on Friday afternoon clarifying that the initial activity will involve archaeological surveys rather than construction activity. According to the administration, lawyers stated this involves mechanically excavating four test pits as a standard predecisional, information-gathering technique to observe soil aspects and recover potential artifacts. Government lawyers noted that this activity will begin no sooner than September 21 and that any park resources disturbed by the activity, including disturbed grass, will be restored by October 31.
Project Scope and Community Criticism
The proposed arch would stand more than twice the height of the Lincoln Memorial, positioned between the nation’s most prominent military cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. Critics have raised concerns regarding financial costs, vehicle, pedestrian, and aviation safety, and the project’s proximity to the final approach path of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, which is less than 2 miles away. Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., criticized the project on Friday, calling it an illegal, gridlock-increasing, narcissistic arch.
Critics contend that a building of this scale would alter the meticulously arranged skyline, breach traditional D.C. height restrictions, and sever the historically meaningful line of sight between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, which was originally established to symbolize reconciliation following the Civil War. While the National Park Service released a report confirming that the arch would disrupt the historical significance of dozens of nearby sites, the agency stated that the purpose and need for the undertaking require the proposed Arch to be located at Memorial Circle.
Dismissal Motion and Supreme Court Precedent
On Thursday, the Trump administration filed a motion seeking to have the case against the arch dismissed, citing a Supreme Court ruling over the White House ballroom. The high court determined that the preservation organization that initiated the ballroom challenge lacked the legal standing to do so, permitting construction to proceed without addressing the underlying merits of the project’s legality. Government lawyers argue the arch case should be dismissed on the same grounds as the ballroom case, stating that plaintiffs’ distaste for the perceived symbolism of the proposed arch does not establish a concrete and particularized injury.
Plaintiffs’ attorney Nicolas Sansone countered that the Supreme Court ruling actually strengthens his clients’ case, noting that the veterans have a deep personal connection to Arlington National Cemetery, which they visit regularly. Counsel Sansone maintained that the administration is trying to preemptively outrun the judicial proceedings by commencing labor ahead of the federal planning commission, which has yet to grant authorization for the arch and is not scheduled to convene again until the beginning of October.
Did You Know? President Trump told journalists last year that the arch is for “me,” while the administration has subsequently stated that the arch is intended to honor the nation’s 250th anniversary.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where is the arch planned to be built?
The arch is planned for Memorial Circle, the traffic island on the historic bridge connecting D.C. to Arlington, Va.
What approvals is the project still awaiting?
The National Capital Planning Commission has yet to grant final endorsement to the arch, which also faces pending evaluations mandated by the federal government concerning historical preservation and aviation safety standards.
Who filed the lawsuit against the arch’s construction?
Earlier this year, legal action to halt the building process was initiated by three former Vietnam service members alongside an architectural specialist, in partnership with the advocacy group Public Citizen.
Keep reading