Following a public uproar over the omission of 97 eligible electors from the final voter list published in February after the Special Intensive Revision, the Chief Electoral Officer of the state announced that many of those individuals have since been added back to the rolls. The initial discrepancy surfaced in Goa, where voters flagged for logical discrepancies were given a window to submit documents and objections. Out of 649 electors who came forward, Electoral Registration Officers and Assistant EROs reviewed the cases and cleared 97 for inclusion. Despite the Goa Chief Electoral Officer sending eight separate communications between February 11 and 17 to reverse the decision and include the names, the final electoral roll published on February 21 omitted them.
Did You Know? Between February 11 and 17, the Goa Chief Electoral Officer issued eight communications requesting a mechanism to overturn the decision so that 97 eligible names could be included before the final roll’s publication on February 21.
Process Adjustments and House-to-House Verification
Addressing the controversy on Thursday, the CEO’s office clarified that the overlooked names underwent separate processing through house-to-house visits conducted by Booth Level Officers for the completion of Form 6. Officials confirmed that many of those affected have now been successfully enrolled, while the remaining cases undergo active processing. The office reiterated its stance that no eligible elector will be left behind in the revised rolls. This local omission also fueled broader debates concerning the centralisation of voter lists, a concern previously voiced by Election Commissioners Vivek Joshi and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu.

Political Fallout and Opposition Accusations
Goa Congress working president Sunil Kawthankar sharply criticized the ruling party, alleging that the BJP relied on the Special Intensive Revision to win elections because it knew it would not get another term in the state. Calling for an immediate rollback of the process, Kawthankar told news agency PTI that the deletion of valid voter names amounts to sabotage and claimed the Election Commission of India has become an arm of the BJP. In response, the BJP characterized these claims as a smear campaign, contending that the opposition is merely frustrated by its inability to win elections and a lack of public support.
National Deletion Figures and Regional Breakdown
The dispute in Goa runs parallel to a wider national debate regarding the deletion of over 13 crore voters—representing nearly 14 percent of India’s total electorate—across various states and Union Territories during the Special Intensive Revision process. The Opposition has seized on these figures to challenge the poll body. Delhi recorded the highest percentage of deletions at 32.8 percent, meaning nearly one in three pre-Revision electors was excluded from the draft list. Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu followed closely at 29.6 percent, Telangana at 21.7 percent, Maharashtra at 21.1 percent, Andaman and Nicobar Islands at 20.6 percent, and Karnataka at 19.5 percent.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many eligible electors were left off the initial February voter list in Goa?
A total of 97 eligible electors were left off the final voter list published on February 21 after their cases were reviewed.
What steps are being taken to fix the omissions?
Booth Level Officers are conducting house-to-house visits for the completion of Form 6 to process the remaining cases and enroll eligible voters.
Which region recorded the highest percentage of voter deletions nationally?
Delhi recorded the highest percentage of deletions at 32.8 percent, excluding nearly one in three pre-revision electors from the draft list.
How do you view the balance between maintaining accurate voter rolls and ensuring every eligible citizen remains enfranchised during large-scale revisions?
Worth a look