Gerry Adams, 77, is currently giving evidence in a civil trial in London, where three men are seeking a High Court ruling holding him personally liable for injuries sustained in bombings that occurred in London and Manchester. Adams began his testimony by wishing the judge, Mr. Justice Swift, “a very happy St Patrick’s Day.”
Denials of Involvement
Adams has stated he never held any role or rank within the IRA. He claims to have had “no involvement whatsoever” in the authorization, planning, or execution of the bombings that injured the claimants.
The Claimants
The three men bringing the claim are John Clark, a victim of the 1973 Old Bailey bombing; Jonathan Ganesh, injured in the 1996 London Docklands bombing; and Barry Laycock, hurt in the 1996 attack at the Arndale Shopping Centre in Manchester. They are each seeking £1 in “vindicatory” damages.
Legal Arguments
Adams’ lawyers argue the case relies on “an assortment of hearsay” and has been brought forward decades after the events. They contend the action should be subject to a three-year limitation period established in legislation passed in 1980.
Possible Next Steps
The court is likely to consider the evidence presented by both sides, including Adams’ 20-page witness statement where he asserts he was never a member of the IRA or its army council. A ruling could hinge on whether the claimants can establish a sufficient link between Adams and the bombings. It is also possible the court could dismiss the case based on the statute of limitations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gerry Adams accused of?
Gerry Adams is accused of being a leading member of the Provisional IRA and being personally liable for injuries sustained by three men in bombings in London and Manchester in 1973 and 1996.
What damages are the claimants seeking?
The claimants, John Clark, Jonathan Ganesh and Barry Laycock, are each seeking £1 in “vindicatory” damages.
What is Adams’ defense?
Adams states he was never a member of the IRA or its army council and had no involvement in the bombings. His lawyers argue the case is based on hearsay and is too late to be brought forward.
How might the outcome of this trial affect ongoing discussions about legacy issues related to the conflict in Northern Ireland?
