Australia’s Online Safety Revolution: A Global Test Case
Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, faces a daily barrage of threats – a stark reality of her role at the forefront of online safety regulation. From battling misinformation and online abuse to protecting children, her position is increasingly critical as the digital landscape evolves.
The Pioneering Social Media Ban: A Bold Move
Australia recently implemented a world-first ban on social media for children under 16, a policy that has garnered both widespread support and significant criticism. Ten platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube, are now subject to the legislation, which came into effect on December 10th. While many parents welcome the government’s intervention, experts raise concerns about the potential for excluding vulnerable groups, such as children in rural areas or those identifying as LGBTQI+, who may rely on online communities for support.
Inman Grant argues that delaying children’s entry into social media – coupled with digital literacy programs – is a worthwhile endeavor. She likens the digital world to the open sea, emphasizing the need for education about risks like algorithmic scams and online predators. Though, she previously used the analogy of protected swimming environments, suggesting a more nuanced approach before ultimately supporting the ban.
Navigating International Scrutiny and Legal Challenges
The implementation of these laws hasn’t been without its challenges. Inman Grant is currently seeking legal counsel to address repeated demands from the U.S. Congress for her testimony regarding Australia’s online safety laws. Republican Congressman Jim Jordan has labeled her a “zealot” and threatened contempt charges. This scrutiny stems from her efforts to compel X (formerly Twitter) to remove graphic footage of a church stabbing in Sydney.
The eSafety Commissioner’s office has as well faced legal challenges to the ban itself, with Reddit and two Australian teenagers filing lawsuits. The office is pursuing legal action against companies that have violated Australia’s online safety laws.
From Tech Industry Insider to Regulator
Inman Grant’s journey to becoming eSafety Commissioner is rooted in decades of experience within the technology sector. After considering a career with the CIA, she began her career as a policy advisor for a U.S. Congressman before joining Microsoft in the 1990s. She later held leadership positions at Microsoft Australia, Twitter, and Adobe.
Her time in the private sector led her to believe that safety wasn’t a priority for tech companies, prompting her to seek a role where she could influence change from within government. She was appointed eSafety Commissioner in January 2017 and reappointed for a further five-year term in January 2022.
The Expanding Role of the eSafety Commissioner
The eSafety Commissioner’s role has expanded significantly in recent years, with its budget quadrupling and its responsibilities growing exponentially. Former Commissioner Alastair MacGibbon notes that the position has become increasingly relevant, and former Communications Minister Paul Fletcher highlights the importance of applying the rule of law to the online world.
Looking Ahead: Artificial Intelligence and Future Regulation
While the social media ban is a landmark achievement, Inman Grant is already turning her attention to the next major challenge: artificial intelligence (AI). She believes that regulation of AI is even more urgent than it was for social media, emphasizing the need to learn from past mistakes and proactively address the potential risks.
As her current term nears its end, Inman Grant suggests she may step down, but remains committed to promoting online safety globally, potentially by assisting other governments in establishing their own regulatory frameworks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the Online Safety Act 2021?
A: It’s Australian legislation designed to create a safer online environment, giving the eSafety Commissioner powers to remove harmful content and regulate social media platforms.
Q: What are the penalties for social media companies that don’t comply with the new laws?
A: Companies can face significant fines for failing to remove illegal and harmful content in a timely manner.
Q: Is the social media ban absolute?
A: No, parental consent can allow children under 16 to access social media platforms, but platforms are required to verify age and obtain consent.
Q: Why is Julie Inman Grant facing scrutiny from the U.S. Congress?
A: She is being asked to testify about Australia’s online safety laws, which some U.S. Lawmakers view as a threat to free speech.
Did you know? Julie Inman Grant was awarded the Public Service Medal in the 2026 Australia Day Honours for her work improving online safety for Australians.
Pro Tip: Parents can utilize parental control settings on devices and platforms to further enhance their children’s online safety.
What are your thoughts on Australia’s approach to online safety? Share your opinions in the comments below!
