News

For four days, Grace Garganta sat inside the public gallery of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. She listened as prosecutors read aloud the words of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte who is accused of unleashing a “drug war” in the Philippines that killed thousands, including Garganta’s brother and father.

At times, Garganta sat silently with other family members of victims. Tears streamed down her face as lawyers recounted details of police crackdowns and streets littered with bodies, some with their heads bound in packing tape.

At other moments, she could barely contain her rage as Nicholas Kaufman, Duterte’s lawyer, countered that relying on Duterte’s former speeches to prove criminal intent is impossible. “That is why it is so important that we are here. To give a face to all those people who were killed. Our loved ones who were killed, us who were left behind, we are not just numbers,” Garganta told DW.

Duterte faces three counts of crimes against humanity for murder, tied to thousands of alleged extrajudicial killings carried out during his time as mayor of Davao City and later as president of the Philippines.

As the pre-trial hearings close, ICC judges will have up to 60 days to decide whether prosecutors have shown “substantial grounds” to move the case to a full trial.

Making the case against Duterte

Garganta’s father, Marcelo, and her brother, Joseph, were killed in 2016. In the years that followed, she went into hiding, gripped by fear after becoming a potential witness.

She traveled to The Hague in September when the confirmation hearing was originally scheduled, but it was postponed at the request of Duterte’s lawyers, citing his frail health. This week, Duterte waived his right to attend the pre-trial hearings in person.

Garganta said she feels not only hopeful but also happiness. “This is not yet a victory. But it is a huge step in that long stairway to justice. There are no shortcuts, it is step by step. But we are still here and we will continue to fight,” she said.

Duterte’s supporters call for his release

Outside the court and across the street from the detention center, where Duterte has been held since his arrest in the Philippines last March, supporters are keeping vigil. They call for Duterte’s release, echoing his legal counsel’s request for an interim release of the 80-year-old former president.

Some, like Magdalena Huelgo, a nurse based in Northern Ireland, traveled to the Netherlands with her husband. “We’re from Davao and we saw all the good things that the president did there. We are here to support him,” she said.

A group of Filipino seafarers traveled from Rotterdam to support Duterte, stating he did much for migrant workers. Marlon Galola, a seafarer of 20 years, told DW, “President Duterte did so much for us migrant workers like when he stood up to Middle East countries over mistreatment. No other president did that for us.”

While acknowledging the pain of victims’ families, supporters insist Duterte acted in what they believed were the country’s interests.

Witness participation marks a historic first

The ICC has authorized 539 witnesses to participate in the confirmation of charges through three appointed lawyers. ICC spokesperson Oriane Maillet said giving victims a formal voice in the courtroom marks a first in international criminal law. “It is essential for victims to have a voice in the proceedings,” she said.

Dayna Chaikel, representative of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) to the ICC, stated, “For a court that sits far from the communities most affected, meaningful participation is essential to its legitimacy. Seeing family members attend this historic hearing after years of impunity is powerful. It takes real courage to be here.”

Standing up for justice despite threats

Sheera Escudero’s brother, Ephraim, was killed during the anti-drug campaign. She showed DW a photo of her brother, whose body was found on the street with his head wrapped in packing tape.

Escudero has endured trolling and threats, including an AI-manufactured video of Ephraim saying he was alive and accusing her of lying. “Now I’m getting messages saying I will be next, like my brother,” she said.

Nymia Pimentel-Simbulan, chairperson of Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), has been working with family members like Garganta and Escudero since the beginning of the drug war. She said many have transformed from victim to advocate, countering disinformation about the drug war.

Frequently Asked Questions

What charges does Duterte face?

Duterte faces three counts of crimes against humanity for murder, tied to thousands of alleged extrajudicial killings carried out during his anti-drug campaign as mayor of Davao City and later as president of the Philippines.

How long will the ICC judges deliberate?

ICC judges will have up to 60 days to decide whether prosecutors have shown “substantial grounds” to move the case to a full trial.

What is the significance of victim participation in these hearings?

The ICC has authorized 539 witnesses to participate, marking a first in international criminal law, and is intended to give a voice to those affected by the alleged crimes.

What role do you believe international courts should play in addressing alleged human rights violations within sovereign nations?

The Dallas Cowboys are making a significant shift with linebacker Marist Liufau, moving him from his current position to outside linebacker. The decision, announced by Coach Brian Schottenheimer, comes as the team adjusts to a 3-4 defensive scheme under new defensive coordinator Christian Parker.

A New Role for the Third-Year Pro

Liufau, a third-round pick out of Notre Dame in 2024, has started 14 of 34 games over two seasons with the Cowboys. During that time, he recorded 80 tackles, 2.5 sacks, and 18 quarterback pressures in 720 snaps, according to Pro Football Focus. But, his playing time diminished last season, with just 200 snaps under former coordinator Matt Eberflus.

The Cowboys believe Liufau’s strengths – his length and ability to disrupt the ball – align well with the demands of an outside linebacker. While the transition presents challenges, particularly in pass-rushing situations, the team hopes he can contribute to solving run-game issues by setting the edge against opposing offenses.

Schottenheimer acknowledged the necessitate for Liufau to gain weight, stating, “He can eat a little bit more to acquire his weight back up a little bit,” to better withstand opposing offensive tackles. Despite this, the Cowboys are optimistic about his potential in the new role. “We perceive he’ll be good,” Schottenheimer said. “He doesn’t have the great twitch, but he’s got the strength to knock guys back.”

The move could provide Liufau with a pathway to remaining on the roster and contributing under Parker’s leadership. However, the team recognizes that a position change doesn’t automatically translate to success, as initial optimism can fade as the season progresses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What position did Marist Liufau previously play?

Liufau previously played as a middle linebacker for the Dallas Cowboys, starting 14 of 34 games in that role.

Why is Liufau changing positions?

The Cowboys are moving Liufau to outside linebacker to better utilize his strengths – specifically his length and ability to disrupt the ball – within their new 3-4 defensive scheme.

What does the Cowboys’ coaching staff say about Liufau’s potential?

Coach Brian Schottenheimer believes Liufau “will be good” in his new role, noting his strength and length, but also acknowledging he needs to gain weight.

Will this position change ultimately secure Liufau’s place on the Cowboys’ roster, or will the challenges prove too significant?

WASHINGTON — For the first time in more than 40 years, a former president will appear before Congress to address criminal allegations. Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will testify before the House Oversight Committee this week in its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.

How did we get here?

The Clintons agreed to testify after a dispute with Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), who accused them of resisting congressional oversight and withholding information regarding their ties to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The Clintons have denied wrongdoing, characterizing the inquiry as a politically motivated effort to deflect attention from President Trump’s connections to Epstein.

Bill Clinton has stated he was unaware of Epstein’s crimes and learned of them through media reports. He took four trips on Epstein’s private jet between 2002 and 2003, some related to perform for the Clinton Foundation, according to a Clinton spokesperson. He is expected to be questioned about photos released by the Department of Justice, including one showing him in a hot tub with Epstein and a redacted figure.

Hillary Clinton maintains she never met Epstein but encountered Maxwell “many years ago.” She has publicly criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the investigation, alleging it is “slow-walking” the process and “stonewalling” congressional requests.

Democrats have raised concerns about the Justice Department withholding files related to accusations that Trump sexually abused a minor. The department has dismissed these claims as “unfounded and false.” Trump has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.

Consequences for major players

The unfolding saga has led to consequences internationally. British police recently arrested Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former prince. In Europe, Thorbjorn Jagland, a former Norwegian Prime Minister, has been charged with “gross corruption,” and Peter Mandelson, a former British ambassador to the United States, was forced out of the House of Lords before his arrest.

The release of the Epstein files has also prompted resignations from business leaders with ties to Epstein and Maxwell, including Thomas Pritzker of Hyatt Hotels, Kathy Ruemmler of Goldman Sachs, and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem of DP World.

What comes next?

The Clintons could face contempt charges from Congress for previously refusing to comply with committee subpoenas. Comer stated the Clintons “must be held accountable.” The former couple hope their testimony will encourage Trump and others to appear before Congress. Representative Ro Khanna believes the arrest of Prince Andrew signals a shift toward greater accountability for those involved in Epstein’s abuses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What prompted the Clintons to agree to testify?

The Clintons agreed to testify after the House was moving toward a bipartisan vote to hold them in criminal contempt of Congress.

What is James Comer’s stated goal in questioning the Clintons?

Comer has said the Clintons’ testimony is “critical to understanding Epstein’s sex trafficking network and the ways they sought to curry favor and influence to shield themselves from scrutiny.”

What has the Justice Department said regarding accusations of withholding information?

The Justice Department has stated that claims of withholding information are “unfounded and false” and that if credible, they “certainly would have been weaponized against Trump already.”

As the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s network continues, what role will transparency and accountability play in uncovering the full extent of the alleged abuses?

Significant progress is being made in the recovery efforts following the recent Sumatra disaster, with the number of refugees declining dramatically. Data from the National Disaster Mitigation Agency (BNPB), as of February 25, shows a reduction from 2,108,582 refugees across three provinces to just 11,250.

Reconstruction and Recovery Underway

The decline in refugee numbers is particularly notable in Aceh Province, where 10,400 people remain displaced, and North Sumatra Province, with 850 refugees. According to Tito Karnavian, head of the Task Force for the Acceleration of Post-Disaster Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (PRR) for the Sumatra Region, West Sumatra has successfully moved all displaced people from tents into temporary shelters.

Karnavian stated that 38 out of the 52 affected districts and cities have returned to normal conditions, with three others nearing full recovery. Eleven districts and cities still require special handling. The determination of “normal” conditions considers factors including governance, public services, land access, economic and social factors, and the restoration of essential infrastructure like gas stations, electricity, water supply, internet access, and waste management.

Challenges Remain

While markets are operational, Karnavian noted that Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are not yet fully functional. Ongoing function includes clearing mud, and repairing bridges, village roads, and regional roads. Previously impacted rice fields, plantations, fish ponds, and fisheries also present ongoing concerns.

Karnavian urged collaboration between ministries, agencies, and regional governments to promote continued post-disaster recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many people were displaced by the Sumatra disaster initially?

Initially, 2,108,582 people were displaced across three provinces following the Sumatra disaster.

Which province has seen the most significant reduction in its refugee population?

West Sumatra has seen the most significant reduction, with all refugees having moved from tents into temporary shelters.

What factors are considered when determining if a region has returned to normal conditions?

Factors include governance, public services, land access, economic and social factors, and the restoration of essential infrastructure such as gas stations, electricity, and water supply.

As recovery efforts continue, it remains to be seen how quickly MSMEs can regain full functionality and what further challenges may arise in the long-term reconstruction process.

The Boston Bruins defeated the Columbus Blue Jackets, extending their point streak to eight games (5-0-3) despite recent shootout losses. The win came after a game that saw Bruins goaltender Jussi Korpisalo briefly leave the game following a collision.

Goaltending Shuffle

Korpisalo exited the game at 6:31 of the second period after a collision with Columbus forward Miles Wood. He briefly left the ice but ultimately returned to the net. However, before play resumed, he was replaced by Michael DiPietro, who was recently recalled from Providence of the American Hockey League and stopped both shots he faced.

Boston coach Marco Sturm explained the decision to keep Jeremy Swayman out of the net, stating he “barely practiced” after the Olympics and the team didn’t want to risk injury. Sturm praised both goaltenders, calling Korpisalo “unbelievable” and highlighting DiPietro’s “key saves” during his brief time in net.

Key Performances and Divisional Implications

Viktor Arvidsson scored twice for the Bruins, while Morgan Geekie and Sean Kuraly similarly contributed goals. The Bruins now hold a record of 33-20-5. Geekie emphasized the importance of the win, noting the competitive nature of their division and the need to secure points.

Korpisalo, who previously played eight years with Columbus, expressed satisfaction in defeating his former team, stating, “It’s always fun to win it.” He acknowledged being surprised by his brief removal from the game but understood the reasoning.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused Jussi Korpisalo to leave the game?

Korpisalo exited the game following a collision with Columbus forward Miles Wood, who was penalized on the play.

Who replaced Jussi Korpisalo when he left the game?

Michael DiPietro, recently recalled from Providence of the American Hockey League, replaced Korpisalo.

What did Morgan Geekie say about the importance of the win?

Geekie said the win was “huge” because “everyone in our division wins every time they play,” and securing points is crucial.

As the Bruins continue their eight-game point streak, will they be able to maintain this momentum and solidify their position in the standings as the season progresses?

Katharine Braddick, currently head of strategic policy at Barclays and senior advisor to the chief executive, has been appointed as the next Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England and chief executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). The appointment, confirmed by the Treasury, will take effect at the complete of June, upon the departure of current PRA chief Sam Woods.

Braddick’s appointment is seen as reinforcing the government’s aim to ease regulations implemented following the 2008 financial crisis. The Treasury stated the selection underscores expectations that UK regulators will be “robust on resilience and ambitious on growth.” Chancellor of the Exchequer emphasized Braddick’s experience and ability to maintain a safe financial system while supporting investment and lending.

Prior to joining Barclays four years ago, Braddick held roles in the public sector, including as director of financial services at the Treasury and a position at the PRA. City officials and workers have been calling for reforms to regulation to stimulate economic growth, a sentiment echoed by Rachel Reeves.

As Deputy Governor, Braddick will oversee the supervision and regulation of banks, building societies, insurers, and major investment firms. She will also participate in the Prudential Regulation Committee, the Financial Policy Committee, and the Court of the Bank of England, contributing to the Bank’s statutory objectives.

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey expressed confidence in Braddick’s ability to lead the PRA with “great ambition and skill,” maintaining strong regulatory foundations for a thriving economy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Katharine Braddick?

Katharine Braddick is currently head of strategic policy at Barclays and senior adviser to the chief executive. She will be the next Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England and chief executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority.

When will Katharine Braddick take on her new role?

Katharine Braddick will take on her new role at the end of June, upon the departure of Sam Woods.

What is the government’s stated aim with this appointment?

The government stated that this appointment reinforces its drive to ease regulations brought in after the 2008 financial crisis, aiming for regulators to be “robust on resilience and ambitious on growth.”

What impact will this appointment have on the future of financial regulation in the UK?