Citroën’s Safety Concerns: A Ripple Effect Across Europe?

<figure class="thumbnail editorial-image thumbnail-16-9 thumbnail-cover" aria-label="Citroën C3 crash test results" role="group">
    <img class="thumb-img-100 thumb-img" src="https://www.automobile-magazine.fr/asset/cms/580x464/243117/config/189888/crash-test-citroen-basalt.jpeg" alt="Citroën Basalt crash test results" width="580" height="326" loading="lazy" role="presentation"/>
    <figcaption class="thumb-figcaption">The Citroën Basalt crash test in South America highlighted safety concerns. © Latin NCAP</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Recent crash test results from Latin NCAP have cast a shadow over Stellantis, particularly concerning the Citroën C3, C3 Aircross, and Opel Frontera models. A zero-star rating for the C3 in South America, coupled with similar results for the Aircross and Basalt, raises critical questions about the safety standards of vehicles built on the ‘Smart Car’ platform – a platform also utilized for European models.  The lack of Euro NCAP testing for these vehicles is fueling anxieties among safety advocates and consumers.</p>

<h2>The Latin NCAP Wake-Up Call</h2>

<p>The criticism from Latin NCAP President Stephan Brodziak was pointed. He accused Stellantis of prioritizing cost-cutting over passenger safety in Latin America, citing unstable structures, poor side impact protection, and the absence of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) in these models. While Stellantis maintains its vehicles meet regional regulations and undergo internal safety assessments at its Betim facility in Brazil, the external scrutiny is intensifying.</p>

<p>The data speaks for itself. The C3 received a dismal zero out of five stars in 2023, attributed partly to limited airbag provisions (only two) but more alarmingly, to structural weaknesses. The C3 Aircross fared no better in November 2024, and the Basalt, while showing slight improvement in child protection (58% versus 11-12% for the C3 and Aircross), still earned a zero-star overall rating.  Crucially, driver protection consistently hovered between 30-35% across all three models.</p>

<div class="editorial-box">
    <p><strong>Did you know?</strong> Latin NCAP’s assessments often focus on the presence of safety equipment, but increasingly, structural integrity is becoming a key determinant in overall ratings.</p>
</div>

<h2>Why Isn’t the European C3 Being Crash Tested?</h2>

<p>The most pressing question is: why haven’t the European versions of the Citroën C3, C3 Aircross, and Opel Frontera undergone Euro NCAP testing? While manufacturers aren’t legally obligated to submit their vehicles, the absence of independent verification is raising eyebrows. Euro NCAP relies on a combination of member state sponsorship (transport departments, FIA, ADAC, etc.) and manufacturer-funded tests.</p>

<p>The lack of testing isn’t unique to Stellantis.  A growing number of automakers are opting out of Euro NCAP assessments, arguing that the tests are no longer a significant sales driver and that the scoring system increasingly favors expensive ADAS features over fundamental crashworthiness. This shift reflects a broader industry debate about the value and relevance of traditional crash testing in the age of advanced safety technologies.</p>

<h3>The Changing Landscape of Vehicle Safety</h3>

<p>The focus is shifting.  Historically, crash tests were the gold standard for evaluating vehicle safety. Now, Euro NCAP is placing greater emphasis on the effectiveness of ADAS systems like automatic emergency braking and lane-keeping assist.  This has led some manufacturers to prioritize these features, potentially at the expense of structural improvements.  The recent changes to Euro NCAP’s scoring system, rewarding ADAS, have further incentivized this trend.</p>

<p>However, a vehicle’s inherent structural integrity remains paramount.  ADAS can *mitigate* accidents, but they can’t *prevent* them entirely. A weak structure can negate the benefits of even the most advanced safety systems. The Latin NCAP results underscore this point, highlighting the vulnerability of the ‘Smart Car’ platform in a real-world collision.</p>

<h2>The Future of Vehicle Safety Assessments</h2>

<p>The current situation suggests a potential divergence in safety standards between emerging markets and developed regions.  Manufacturers may continue to offer lower-spec, less safe vehicles in price-sensitive markets while focusing on higher-rated models for Europe and North America. This raises ethical concerns about equitable access to safety technology.</p>

<p>We are likely to see increased pressure on Euro NCAP to adapt its testing protocols to better reflect real-world driving conditions and prioritize fundamental safety aspects like structural integrity.  Furthermore, independent safety organizations may emerge in other regions to provide unbiased assessments and hold manufacturers accountable.</p>

<div class="editorial-box">
    <p><strong>Pro Tip:</strong> When researching a new vehicle, don’t solely rely on Euro NCAP ratings.  Consider the specific safety features offered, the vehicle’s structural design, and independent reviews from reputable sources.</p>
</div>

<h2>FAQ: Citroën Safety Concerns</h2>

<ul>
    <li><strong>Are European Citroën C3 models as unsafe as the Latin American versions?</strong>  It’s currently unknown, as they haven’t been independently crash tested by Euro NCAP.</li>
    <li><strong>Why aren’t all cars crash tested?</strong> Manufacturers aren’t legally required to submit vehicles for testing, and some choose not to due to cost or potential negative results.</li>
    <li><strong>What is Euro NCAP changing its testing to focus on?</strong> Euro NCAP is increasing the weighting of ADAS systems in its scoring, which has led to criticism that it prioritizes technology over basic crashworthiness.</li>
    <li><strong>What does Stellantis say about the safety concerns?</strong> Stellantis maintains its vehicles meet regional regulations and undergo internal safety assessments.</li>
</ul>

<p>The unfolding situation with the Citroën C3 and its platform siblings serves as a stark reminder that safety shouldn’t be a variable based on market.  Consumers deserve transparency and independent verification of vehicle safety, regardless of where they live.</p>

<p><strong>Explore more:</strong> <a href="https://www.automobile-magazine.fr/toute-l-actualite/article/50389-pourquoi-les-voitures-pourraient-obtenir-de-moins-bonnes-notes-aux-crash-tests-des-2026" target="_self">Why Cars Might Get Lower Crash Test Scores in 2026</a> | <a href="https://www.automobile-magazine.fr/toute-l-actualite/article/50265-euro-ncap-veut-mieux-encadrer-les-aides-a-la-conduite-apres-les-avoir-encouragees-sans-discernement" target="_self">Euro NCAP Wants to Better Frame Driver Aids</a></p>

<p><strong>What are your thoughts on vehicle safety standards? Share your opinion in the comments below!</strong></p>