WASHINGTON (AP) — Negotiations continued late Monday between former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Congressional leaders regarding a subpoena for their testimony in the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. However, Representative James Comer, the Republican chairing the investigation, stated that a formal agreement had not yet been reached.
Negotiations and Potential Charges
Representative Comer was prepared to advance criminal contempt of Congress charges against both Clintons Monday evening for initially defying the subpoena. This action occurred as a spokesperson for the Clintons, Angel Ureña, indicated their willingness to testify, stating on social media that they “will be there.” Comer, however, emphasized that he had not received anything in writing and that acceptance of their offer “depends on what they say.”
Earlier Monday, Comer rejected a proposal from the Clintons’ attorneys for Bill Clinton to participate in a transcribed interview and for Hillary Clinton to submit a sworn declaration. Comer insisted on sworn depositions from both Clintons before the committee to fulfill the subpoenas.
Political Context and Potential Consequences
The move to hold the Clintons in contempt comes as the Republican-controlled Oversight panel advanced the charges last month. Nine Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the charges against Bill Clinton, citing a desire for full transparency in the Epstein investigation, while three Democrats supported advancing charges against Hillary Clinton. The potential consequences of a conviction for criminal contempt include substantial fines and even incarceration.
The Clintons have criticized Comer’s actions, alleging that he is injecting politics into the investigation and failing to address delays in the release of Department of Justice case files related to Epstein. Bill Clinton’s relationship with Epstein has become a central focus for Republicans as they pursue a broader reckoning related to the case.
Historically, Congress has generally deferred to former presidents, and none have been compelled to testify. However, the current situation raises the possibility of Congress utilizing one of its most severe punitive measures against a former president for the first time.
Democratic Response and Next Steps
House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries indicated his caucus would discuss the contempt resolutions this week and determine whether to oppose them. Jeffries characterized the contempt effort as a “hard no” and accused Comer of prioritizing political retribution over investigating delays in the release of case files. He stated, “They don’t want a serious interview, they want a charade.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the subpoenas for the Clintons?
The subpoenas were issued by the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, and specifically to gather information related to Bill Clinton’s relationship with the convicted sex offender.
What is criminal contempt of Congress?
Criminal contempt of Congress is a charge that can be brought against individuals who willfully fail to comply with a congressional subpoena. If convicted, the penalties can include fines and imprisonment.
What is the current status of the negotiations?
As of late Monday, negotiations were ongoing, with the Clintons indicating a willingness to testify. However, Representative Comer stated that he had not received a formal, written agreement and that the terms of any testimony would need to be acceptable to the committee.
Given the ongoing negotiations and the potential for a House vote on the contempt resolutions, what will ultimately happen remains to be seen. It is possible the Clintons and the committee could reach a compromise, or the House could proceed with the contempt charges.
