An Auckland company, Tank Test Laboratories 2017 Limited, has been fined $300,000 following an explosion at its Papatoetoe facility in March 2024 that left a forklift driver hospitalized with burns.
Incident Details
The explosion occurred when a forklift ignited Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) released from condemned cylinders. Several 9kg gas bottles subsequently exploded, creating a “significant fire.” The injured driver spent nine weeks recovering from his burns.
Judge Gus Andrée Wiltens, speaking at sentencing in Manukau District Court, stated the hazard was “clear and obvious,” and could have been eliminated “at no cost” by preventing simultaneous forklift operation and degassing procedures.
Systemic Concerns
WorkSafe principal inspector David Worsfold emphasized that the case reflects a broader pattern across industries, where businesses identify risks but fail to implement effective controls. According to WorkSafe, simply having procedures is insufficient; they must be actively monitored and enforced, otherwise they are “just paper.”
WorkSafe noted that the company purchased a flame-proof forklift after the incident occurred, a step that, had it been taken sooner, would have prevented the explosion. The company was also ordered to pay $5000 in reparations.
Looking Ahead
other companies may review their safety protocols in light of this case. WorkSafe may also increase scrutiny of workplaces with similar hazards. Further investigations could be launched if similar incidents are reported.
Frequently Asked Questions
What caused the explosion?
The explosion was caused by a forklift igniting Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) released from condemned cylinders, leading to the explosion of several 9kg gas bottles.
What did Judge Wiltens say about the hazard?
Judge Wiltens stated the hazard was “clear and obvious” and could have been eliminated “at no cost” by ensuring the forklift and degassing operations never happened at the same time.
What did WorkSafe say about the company’s procedures?
WorkSafe stated that while Tank Test had procedures, “procedures that aren’t monitored and enforced are just paper.”
Considering the emphasis on proactive safety measures in this case, how can businesses best ensure their procedures are truly protecting their workers?
