Democrats Block ICE Reforms, Defend Sanctuary Cities Amidst Funding Debate

by Chief Editor

Negotiations over funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are facing a critical juncture as Democrats signal firm opposition to any ICE reforms that target sanctuary cities. This standoff comes amid ongoing scrutiny following fatal shootings involving ICE and Border Patrol agents.

Standoff Over Sanctuary Cities

Several Democratic senators have stated, according to Axios, that the federal government should not attempt to compel local governments to assist with White House immigration enforcement efforts.

Did You Know? Novel York City first adopted sanctuary city policies in 1989 via an executive order from Mayor Ed Koch, and every mayor since—including Rudy Giuliani—has maintained those policies.

Senate Democrats are drawing a firm line, asserting that any attempt to crack down on sanctuary cities is “a nonstarter,” according to statements reported by Axios. Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) explained that such changes would “grant ICE even greater authority over local law enforcement.”

Other Democrats echoed this sentiment, with Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) emphasizing that the focus should remain on ICE’s conduct. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) clarified that “there aren’t sanctuary cities in statute,” but rather varying levels of cooperation between localities and federal authorities.

Republican Counterarguments

Republicans present a contrasting view. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) stated that “these magnets of illegal immigration have to go.” A new bill introduced by Senator Eric Schmitt aims to target sanctuary cities by potentially stripping federal funds and increasing protections for federal immigration officers, as reported by Fox News. The bill would similarly expand civil liability for jurisdictions that release individuals who later commit violent crimes.

Expert Insight: The current impasse highlights a fundamental disagreement over the balance of power between federal and local authorities in immigration enforcement, and the potential consequences of different approaches to public safety.

As of October 31, 2025, the Justice Department estimates that 13 states, 18 cities, and three counties are classified as sanctuary areas, characterized by policies limiting cooperation with ICE in apprehending and deporting individuals.

What’s Next?

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) indicated to reporters that while certain issues are non-negotiable for both sides, there may be room for compromise on a narrower set of ICE reforms. This could potentially avert a shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security, which is scheduled to occur Friday night.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a “sanctuary city”?

According to Senator Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), there is no official definition of “sanctuary city” in statute. These jurisdictions simply have varying levels of cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

What is the Republican position on sanctuary cities?

Republicans, like Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), view sanctuary cities as “magnets of illegal immigration” and seek to restrict them.

What is at stake if DHS funding is not renewed?

If DHS funding is not renewed, agencies like ICE, TSA, the Coast Guard, and FEMA could be shut down, according to Senator Angus King (I-Maine).

Given the current political climate, will lawmakers be able to reach a compromise that addresses both Democratic and Republican concerns regarding ICE and sanctuary cities?

You may also like

Leave a Comment