Why Denmark’s Intelligence Service Is Redefining “Allies” in Europe
In a startling turn of events, Denmark’s military intelligence agency Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste (FET) has publicly labelled the United States as a “potential threat” to European security. The assessment, originally part of the agency’s annual report, is the first time an EU member state has openly questioned the reliability of Washington, a nation long‑viewed as the bedrock of NATO’s collective defence.
Arctic Ambitions and the Greenland Question
FET points to renewed U.S. interest in Greenland – a strategic outpost that sits atop the Arctic’s most valuable mineral deposits and serves as a gateway for long‑range missile trajectories. In 2024, the Trump administration’s overt overtures to “purchase” Greenland resurfaced under new strategic jargon, prompting Danish officials to label the move “predatory.”
Did you know? More than 80% of the world’s untapped rare‑earth elements lie within the Arctic Circle, making control over Greenland a coveted asset for any power seeking technological and military supremacy.
Cyber‑Espionage & Economic Coercion
According to the report, U.S. cyber‑operations have escalated, targeting Danish critical infrastructure and EU supply chains. The agency cites increased “high‑tariff threats” and sanctions as tools Washington is ready to employ even against its own allies.
Recent data from ENISA shows a 37% rise in cyber‑incidents linked to state‑backed actors in Europe between 2021‑2023, with the United States accounting for a significant share of the attribution.
China’s Expanding Naval Footprint
While Denmark warns about Washington, it also highlights China’s “unprecedented shipbuilding tempo.” The People’s Republic now produces three times more warships annually than the United States and has doubled its carrier procurement in the last five years.
In a case study, the U.S. Navy’s 2023 assessment noted that by 2027, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) could field a fleet capable of projecting power from the South China Sea to the Arctic, challenging NATO’s traditional maritime dominance.
Russia’s Persistent Threat Landscape
FET still ranks Moscow as the most immediate danger to Europe. Russian military spending has risen by 4% in 2023, and the Kremlin continues to integrate “militarised education” into the national curriculum, ensuring a new generation of conscripts ready for prolonged conflict.
“Russia publicly signals a willingness to negotiate,” the report states, “yet its incremental demands on Ukraine and NATO show no sign of compromise.”
Islamist Terrorism: A Cross‑Border Concern
Denmark’s intelligence chiefs maintain that the resurgence of Islamist terrorism remains a core security priority. They warn that the weakening of U.S. pressure on ISIS‑linked groups could enable former fighters—especially women, who comprise a large share of returnees—to re‑enter Europe and carry out attacks.
Future Trends Shaping Europe’s Security Architecture
1. Fragmented Alliance Networks
Expect a gradual shift from a monolithic NATO to a more fluid coalition of “regional security pacts.” Countries like Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states are already deepening bilateral defence agreements that bypass traditional U.S. command structures.
2. Arctic‑Centric Defence Postures
With the Arctic ice receding, nations will invest heavily in polar‑capable assets. Denmark plans to double its “Arctic Surveillance Programme” by 2028, integrating satellite, drone, and under‑sea sensor networks to monitor both Russian and American activity.
3. Hybrid Warfare as the New Norm
Economic leverage, cyber‑operations, and disinformation will dominate future confrontations. According to a 2023 RAND Corp. study, hybrid attacks cost NATO an average of €1.2 billion per incident in 2022 alone.
4. European Strategic Autonomy
EU leaders are accelerating the “Strategic Compass” initiative, aiming for a 40% increase in European defence R&D spending by 2030. This ambition seeks to reduce reliance on U.S. technology and develop home‑grown capabilities in AI, quantum communication, and hypersonic weapons.
5. Energy Security as a Geopolitical Lever
Renewable‑energy corridors across the North Sea and Baltic region will become critical infrastructure, potentially turning into “energy‑front lines” in any future East‑West standoff.
FAQ
- Is the United States really a threat to Europe?
- FET’s report argues that unchecked U.S. ambitions—especially in the Arctic and cyber domains—could undermine European sovereignty, even if the intention is not overtly hostile.
- How is China reshaping naval power in Europe?
- Through rapid shipbuilding and the deployment of overseas bases (e.g., Djibouti), China is extending its maritime reach, prompting European navies to reassess force allocation.
- What does “strategic autonomy” mean for EU citizens?
- It refers to the EU’s ability to act independently on defence and foreign‑policy matters, reducing reliance on external powers for security guarantees.
- Can the Arctic become a flashpoint for conflict?
- Yes. The convergence of valuable resources, new shipping lanes, and military trajectories makes the Arctic a likely arena for future geopolitical tension.
Pro Tip: Staying Informed
Subscribe to our weekly security brief to receive curated analyses on NATO dynamics, Arctic policy, and cyber‑threat intel directly to your inbox.
Join the conversation: How do you see the balance of power shifting in Europe over the next decade? Leave a comment below or get in touch with your thoughts.
Read more:
