Dharma Pongrekun: Critical View on Global Pandemic Narratives & Virus Origins

by Chief Editor

The Growing Skepticism Around Global Pandemic Narratives

Former Indonesian National Police officer Dharma Pongrekun has consistently voiced critical opinions regarding global responses to disease outbreaks. His recent commentary on the Nipah virus echoes previous concerns he raised during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a pattern of orchestrated narratives surrounding emerging health threats.

A Pattern of Fear-Based Compliance?

Pongrekun argues that the announcement of each recent “virus” isn’t primarily a matter of public health, but a question of who is naming it, on whose authority, and for what purpose. He highlights a recurring trend: the global introduction of a virus accompanied by a uniform narrative demanding compliance, rather than fostering genuine scientific vigilance.

This perspective challenges the conventional understanding of pandemic responses, suggesting that fear is often prioritized over informed preparedness. He questions why the focus shifts from the virus’s actual danger to controlling public reaction.

From COVID-19 to Nipah: A Consistent Critique

Pongrekun previously gained attention for labeling COVID-19 a “game played by global elites.” He now applies a similar lens to the current Nipah virus outbreaks, prompting a deeper examination of the power dynamics and vested interests surrounding these events.

He points to a cycle of outbreaks – “Super flu” disappearing, bird flu fading, swine flu vanishing, SARS concluding, MERS subsiding, and now Nipah – that raise questions about accountability and the long-term consequences of these global health events.

The Intersection of Biology, Politics, and Economics

Pongrekun emphasizes the distinction between biological realities and the political and economic forces that shape pandemic responses. He believes that narratives are often constructed to elicit obedience rather than informed caution.

“If the threat is always extraordinary, why is the narrative extraordinary, not the facts?” he asks, suggesting a deliberate manipulation of public perception.

A Call for Critical Thinking

Pongrekun urges the public to adopt a more critical mindset when evaluating information about viruses and outbreaks. He advocates for rejecting automatic compliance with terms like “virus” and questioning who benefits from narratives of fear.

He clarifies that his critique is not a rejection of science, but a rejection of the panic he believes is deliberately packaged as scientific truth. He supports scientific inquiry but opposes the exploitation of fear for control.

The Epstein Files Connection

Recent attention surrounding Dharma Pongrekun has been amplified by the release of the Epstein Files in late January 2026. Online discussions have linked his past statements to documents within the files, sparking renewed interest in his theories.

The Epstein Files, a collection of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes, have revealed connections to numerous high-profile individuals, including discussions about pandemic simulation concepts. An email from Epstein to Bill Gates in 2017 reportedly discussed a “digital health system,” raising questions about pre-pandemic planning.

Did you know?

Dharma Pongrekun is a former three-star police general in Indonesia, with a career spanning decades in law enforcement.

FAQ

Q: What is Dharma Pongrekun’s main argument?

A: He argues that global narratives surrounding outbreaks often prioritize control and compliance over genuine scientific vigilance and transparency.

Q: What are the Epstein Files?

A: They are a collection of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, which have revealed connections to prominent figures and discussions about pandemic preparedness.

Q: Does Dharma Pongrekun reject science?

A: No, he supports scientific inquiry but criticizes the use of fear and panic in public health messaging.

Q: What is Pongrekun’s background?

A: He is a retired Indonesian police officer and former analyst.

Pro Tip: Always evaluate information from multiple sources and consider the potential biases of those sources.

Want to learn more about global health security and critical thinking? Explore our other articles on pandemic preparedness and media literacy.

You may also like

Leave a Comment