Ex-PM Muhyiddin says Malaysia’s opposition pact PN to abolish chairman post, introduce new ‘councils’

by Chief Editor

Malaysia’s Political Chessboard: A Power Struggle Within PN and What It Means for the Future

Recent events within the Perikatan Nasional (PN) coalition in Malaysia reveal a deeper power struggle, triggered by a state-level crisis in Perlis and escalating into a dispute over leadership. The resignation of Muhyiddin Yassin as PN chairman, followed by maneuvering over his replacement and the cancellation of a crucial supreme council meeting, signals a potential fracturing of the alliance. This isn’t simply an internal squabble; it has ramifications for the broader Malaysian political landscape.

The Perlis Crisis: A Catalyst for Change

The immediate cause of the turmoil was the political upheaval in Perlis. The ousting of Chief Minister Mohd Shukri Ramli, coupled with the retraction of support from state assemblymen – notably from within both PAS and Bersatu – exposed underlying tensions. This wasn’t a straightforward power grab; it was a demonstration of shifting allegiances and a test of PN’s internal cohesion. The subsequent sacking of the PAS assemblymen who supported Shukri further deepened the rift.

This situation highlights a recurring theme in Malaysian politics: the importance of state-level control. Control of states like Perlis, though small, provides crucial political leverage and resources. Losing ground in these areas can significantly weaken a party’s national standing. Similar dynamics played out in 2018, where state control proved pivotal in the change of government.

Muhyiddin’s Position and the Legal Arguments

Muhyiddin Yassin’s resignation, while presented as a voluntary step, was clearly influenced by the Perlis crisis. The subsequent attempt to appoint a new chairman without his involvement – and the invitation notice he didn’t receive – ignited the current dispute. Takiyuddin Hassan’s legal arguments, invoking the principle of functus officio (meaning an office has discharged its function), attempted to justify proceeding without Muhyiddin. However, this interpretation is contested, and the reliance on legal technicalities underscores the lack of consensus.

Pro Tip: Understanding the concept of functus officio is crucial when analyzing Malaysian legal and political disputes. It often becomes a point of contention when leadership transitions are contested.

This situation mirrors similar debates seen in other parliamentary democracies, such as the UK, where the timing of a leader’s resignation and the subsequent leadership contest can be fraught with legal and political challenges.

The Future of PN: Fragmentation or Re-Alignment?

The current impasse raises several key questions about PN’s future. Will Muhyiddin’s attempt to convene a pre-council meeting succeed in restoring consensus? Or will the coalition fracture along party lines, with PAS and Bersatu pursuing increasingly divergent agendas? The outcome will likely depend on several factors, including the ability of key leaders to compromise and the broader political climate.

One potential scenario is a re-alignment of forces, with smaller parties within PN gaining more influence. Gerakan and MIPP, while currently aligned with Muhyiddin, could leverage the situation to demand greater representation and a more prominent role in the coalition’s decision-making process. This could lead to a more fragmented, but potentially more stable, PN.

Did you know? PN’s success in the 2022 general election was largely attributed to its ability to appeal to rural voters and capitalize on dissatisfaction with the established political order. Maintaining this appeal will be crucial for its future survival.

Implications for Malaysian Politics

The instability within PN has broader implications for Malaysian politics. A weakened PN could benefit Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Harapan coalition, potentially leading to greater political stability. However, it could also create opportunities for other parties, such as UMNO, to regain lost ground. The delicate balance of power in Malaysia means that any significant shift within one coalition can have ripple effects across the entire political spectrum.

Recent data from the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute suggests that public trust in political parties in Malaysia remains low. This lack of trust creates a volatile political environment, where even minor crises can quickly escalate into major upheavals. [ISEAS Report on Malaysian Politics]

FAQ

Q: What is functus officio?
A: It’s a legal term meaning an office has completed its function and no longer has the power to act.

Q: What triggered the crisis in Perlis?
A: The resignation of the Chief Minister and the withdrawal of support from state assemblymen.

Q: What is the significance of Muhyiddin Yassin’s resignation?
A: It signals a potential power struggle within PN and raises questions about the coalition’s future direction.

Q: Will PN break apart?
A: It’s possible, but a re-alignment of forces is also a likely scenario.

Q: How does this affect the current Malaysian government?
A: A weakened PN could benefit the ruling Pakatan Harapan coalition.

Want to learn more about Malaysian politics? Explore our other articles here. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates and analysis!

You may also like

Leave a Comment