Global Trade on Shifting Sands: What to Expect in 2026 and Beyond
While global merchandise trade showed surprising resilience in 2024, navigating a landscape increasingly shaped by protectionist policies, geopolitical tensions, and logistical disruptions, the calm is deceptive. Experts warn that 2026 is poised to be a year of significant upheaval, building on the foundations laid by current trade dynamics. The era of predictable global commerce is fading, replaced by a more fragmented and volatile system.
The Looming Shadow of US Trade Policy
Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House and his stated intention to implement widespread tariffs are the most immediate and significant threat. Even without a full-scale trade war, the mere possibility is reshaping trade routes. John McCown, a leading figure in the shipping industry, noted a 2.1% increase in global container volumes in October 2024, but cautioned this masks a fundamental shift. The US, historically a major import hub, saw an 8% contraction in inbound volumes, while regions like Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and India experienced robust growth.
This isn’t simply a geographical redistribution; it’s a re-organization of supply chains. McCown highlights that after a 15.2% surge in US container imports in 2023, the 2024 reversal is even more dramatic than anticipated. Companies are proactively diversifying away from reliance on the US market, anticipating further trade barriers.
USMCA Renegotiation: A Potential Flashpoint
The upcoming review of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) adds another layer of uncertainty. While the agreement itself isn’t necessarily at risk of collapse, the renegotiation process is likely to be contentious. The US Trade Representative, Jamison Greer, has already received over 1,500 public comments, with widespread calls for amendments. However, improvements beneficial to one country often come at the expense of another.
The recent breakdown in trade talks with Canada over anti-tax advertisements – featuring a likeness of Ronald Reagan – underscores the strained relationship and hints at the potential for escalating disputes. This highlights a broader trend: trade negotiations are increasingly politicized and susceptible to unpredictable shifts based on domestic political considerations.
Navigational Hazards: Red Sea and Demand Surges
Logistical challenges are compounding the trade landscape. The temporary disruption to shipping through the Red Sea, due to Houthi attacks, demonstrated the fragility of global supply chains. While the resumption of traffic through the Red Sea offers some relief, Lars Jensen, CEO of Vespucci Maritime, warns of a potential double whammy in 2025.
The first is a surge in capacity as ships rerouted around Africa return to their original routes, potentially causing port congestion in Europe. The second, and potentially more significant, is a demand shock. If the US economy accelerates as predicted by the Trump administration, a massive restocking effort by businesses could overwhelm the existing transportation infrastructure, echoing the bottlenecks seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fragile Agreements and the China Factor
The Biden administration touted several trade agreements in 2024, but many are not traditional, binding treaties. The agreement with China, for example, is essentially a one-year truce, leaving significant uncertainty. China is actively exerting pressure on countries aligned with Washington, as evidenced by Indonesia’s delay in signing a trade agreement with the US and China’s displeasure with Malaysia and Cambodia.
Even the UK is facing new obstacles in its trade negotiations with the EU and India, with potential retaliatory measures threatened over EU tech regulations.
The Supreme Court’s Role: A $64 Billion Question
Perhaps the most critical wildcard is the US Supreme Court’s ruling on the legality of Trump’s tariffs. A defeat for the administration raises the thorny question of whether the US will be required to refund billions of dollars in tariffs already collected – an estimated $64 billion. Kevin Hassett, former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, suggests that even if the court rules against the government, a widespread refund is unlikely due to administrative hurdles.
Market predictions currently give Trump a 75% chance of losing the case, potentially forcing the administration to seek alternative methods of imposing trade barriers.
FAQ: Navigating the Trade Turbulence
- What is USMCA? The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is a free trade agreement replacing NAFTA.
- How will the Red Sea situation impact trade? Resumption of traffic may cause port congestion in Europe, and a surge in US demand could overwhelm transport capacity.
- What is the biggest risk to global trade in 2026? The implementation of widespread tariffs by the US is considered the most significant threat.
- Will tariffs be refunded if the US loses the Supreme Court case? A full refund is unlikely due to administrative challenges, but the possibility remains.
Explore Further: World Trade Organization – For comprehensive data and analysis on global trade trends.
Stay Informed: Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on global trade and economic developments. Subscribe Now
