As Israel marks three years since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks, NPR reported that regional allies repeatedly warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that a major assault was imminent. Netanyahu has denied receiving these warnings while facing intense public backlash and upcoming national elections.
Warnings From Regional Allies and Intelligence Chiefs
Israeli security agencies and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were notified repeatedly in the weeks and days leading up to Oct. 7, 2023. Haaretz also published details of these warnings.
A Palestinian mediator named Sufian Abu Zaida told NPR that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar dictated a warning on Sept. 14, 2023. Sinwar stated that an earthquake was coming in negotiations and told Israel to prepare to empty its prisons.
The Emirati leader warned that a quake would hit the region if no progress was made on a prisoner deal.
Egypt also delivered direct intelligence. A senior Egyptian official told NPR that Egypt’s head of intelligence at the time, Abbas Kamel, traveled to Israel and met with Mossad and Shin Bet chiefs.
Netanyahu’s Denial and the Political Aftermath in Israel
Netanyahu has denied receiving any prior warnings. The prime minister and his defense minister have instead issued new warnings that Hamas might try to challenge Israel around the current memorial day and national elections.
The security failures of Oct. 7 have fueled fierce public anger. During a recent state memorial ceremony at Mount Herzl cemetery in Jerusalem, a bereaved father yelled at Netanyahu, telling him he failed to protect his son. Political scientist Gayil Talshir of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem told NPR that the new reports on early warnings contradict the narrative Netanyahu presents to the public.
The Boston Globe reported that Shin Bet head Ronen Bar called for a broad investigation into the attack, noting that Israel had obtained a copy of Hamas’s plan of attack. While military and internal reviews have taken place, Netanyahu has repeatedly opposed establishing an independent state commission of inquiry until after upcoming parliamentary elections, arguing it would function as a partisan witch hunt.
Historical Parallels to Pearl Harbor and September 11
CBS News analyzed the Oct. 7 intelligence failure alongside historic surprises like the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States. In all three instances, authorities possessed fragments of information or indicators of an impending threat but failed to connect the dots.
Shlomo Mofaz, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official heading the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, told CBS News that intelligence agencies gathered plenty of information prior to Oct. 7 but simply did not understand it correctly. The 9/11 Commission similarly described the American failure as a catastrophic lack of imagination, noting that institutions focused heavily on conventional foes rather than small, determined militant groups.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Oct. 7 Warnings
Did Israel have possession of Hamas’s actual attack plans before Oct. 7?
Yes. According to CBS News and internal Shin Bet reviews cited by The Boston Globe, Israeli officials possessed Hamas’s secret attack plan a year before the invasion occurred.
What specific warning did Egypt deliver to Israeli leadership?
According to NPR, Egypt’s head of intelligence at the time, Abbas Kamel, traveled to Israel to meet with Mossad and Shin Bet chiefs.
How has Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to reports of advanced warnings?
Netanyahu has denied receiving any such warnings.
What position does Netanyahu hold regarding an independent investigation?
As reported by The Boston Globe, Netanyahu has stonewalled the creation of an independent state commission of inquiry to prevent what he describes as a partisan witch hunt ahead of national elections.
Questions Remaining Open After Three Years
The exact nature of how high-level Israeli security recipients processed the warnings from Egypt, the UAE, and Palestinian mediators remains heavily disputed. While international media reports detail direct communications to individuals close to Netanyahu, the prime minister maintains his denial, and no independent state commission has yet convened to establish a formal accounting before voters cast ballots.
More on Shin Bet
Keep reading