The Stifled Engine: Why Creative Destruction is Failing in Japan – and What It Means for the World
For decades, economists have lauded “creative destruction” – the relentless process where innovation replaces the old, driving economic progress. Joseph Schumpeter famously likened it to Darwinian “survival of the fittest” in the business world. But what happens when that process breaks down? Japan offers a stark warning: a failure to embrace creative destruction can lead to economic stagnation, even as companies remain profitable.
The Promise of Creative Destruction
The core idea, as Schumpeter articulated, is that capitalism isn’t about static efficiency, but dynamic change. New companies, fueled by innovation, inevitably displace older, less adaptable ones. This churn isn’t painful; it’s a sign of a healthy, growing economy. In Europe, nearly 40% of annual productivity growth stems from both the birth of new companies and the exit of inferior ones.
Japan’s Anemic Growth: A Case Study in Stifled Innovation
Japan presents a dramatically different picture. While new companies are emerging, the rate at which failing firms exit the market is shockingly low. This has resulted in a situation where, in recent decades, the average company leaving the market actually had higher productivity than those that remained. This isn’t “survival of the fittest,” but “survival of the least fit.”
The numbers are telling. Between 1995 and 2005, the negative impact of exiting productive firms outweighed the positive impact of new, innovative companies entering the market. This trend has contributed to Japan’s lagging growth compared to other OECD countries, ranking last in employee growth after ten years.
The Root of the Problem: A Safety Net That Protects Failure
This isn’t a natural phenomenon. Japan’s economic miracle, from 1955-1973, was built on a robust cycle of creative destruction. However, following the oil shocks of the 1970s and a subsequent slowdown in growth, the government intervened, prioritizing stability over dynamism. Instead of a strong social safety net to support workers through transitions, the focus shifted to propping up failing companies.
Banks, often with government guarantees, continued lending to “zombie” companies – firms that wouldn’t survive in a truly competitive market. This created a vicious cycle: new, innovative firms struggled to secure funding, while inefficient incumbents were kept afloat. Remarkably, in 2024, 63,000 incorporated SMEs closed, half of which were profitable.
The Succession Crisis: A Looming Threat
Adding to the problem is a looming succession crisis. Millions of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face closure as aging owners retire without a successor. The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) warns that this could lead to significant job losses. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that banks often require personal guarantees for loans, making it tricky for new owners to take over and invest in these businesses.
Flexicurity: A Scandinavian Solution
The Scandinavian countries offer a potential path forward. Their “flexicurity” model combines the flexibility of creative destruction with a robust social safety net. This includes generous unemployment benefits, coupled with active labor market policies – continuous education, job training, and matchmaking services – to help workers transition to new opportunities. Japan currently spends only 0.3% of its GDP on active labor measures, compared to an average of 1.1% across OECD countries.
What’s Being Done – and What Needs to Change
The Financial Services Agency (FSA) has begun encouraging banks to reduce the reliance on personal guarantees for loans. However, progress is slow, with a significant portion of new loans still requiring them. The fundamental issue remains: a cultural and political reluctance to allow failing companies to fail, and a lack of adequate support for those displaced by creative destruction.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- What is creative destruction? It’s the process where new innovations replace older ones, driving economic progress.
- Why is it important? It leads to increased productivity, higher living standards, and a more dynamic economy.
- What’s happening in Japan? The process of creative destruction is stifled, leading to economic stagnation.
- What is “flexicurity”? A combination of flexible labor markets and a strong social safety net to support workers through transitions.
Ready to dive deeper? Explore Order in Japan or The Contest for Japan’s Economic Future to learn more.
What are your thoughts on the challenges facing Japan? Share your insights in the comments below!
