Documentary claims regarding psychedelic substances and property transactions involving Christian Sønstebø have triggered legal action and widespread public reaction in Norway. The four-part TV 2 series titled “Kollaps – Profeten i Bærum” depicts Sønstebø operating a closed farming community on Nordhaug gård in Bærum, where approximately 30 adults and children resided, while featuring allegations of psilocybin and LSD use. Following the broadcast, Sønstebø and his partner Carine Smeby Schackt filed a legal petition against TV 2, disputing how the production portrayed their lives and accusing the network of breaking prior agreements.
Legal Battle and Property Discrepancies Surrounding Sønstebø
The core dispute centers on both the contents of the documentary and conflicting accounts of property transactions linked to Sønstebø. While the series portrays Sønstebø as a community leader operating under a divine calling, tangible questions have emerged regarding his real estate claims. In the final episodes of the series, Sønstebø states that he purchased the historic Dalbo gård, located near his former agricultural property. However, the current owner of Dalbo gård confirmed that no such sale took place. Gudbrand Teigen, the agricultural chief in Bærum municipality, stated that the municipality has received no purchase application from Sønstebø, and the national property registry shows no record of an ownership transfer.
Did You Know? Christian Sønstebø originally purchased Nordhaug gård in 2014 for 30 million Norwegian kroner, later selling the property in the autumn to London-based Julian Karel Austeng Pettersen for 72 million kroner.
Psychiatrist warns against microdosing psilocybin to children
The documentary features an anonymous interview subject claiming that children within the community received small mixtures containing psilocybin mushrooms. Psychiatrist Tor-Morten Kvam described the notion of microdosing psilocybin to children as completely irresponsible. Kvam noted that while limited clinical research investigates psychedelics for adult conditions such as anxiety, depression, and addiction, scientific literature contains virtually no data regarding microdosing minors with such illicit substances. Sønstebø has maintained that he has no knowledge of such occurrences.
Expert Insight: The intersection of reality television production, private community dynamics, and investigative journalism frequently highlights the friction between participant expectations and editorial narrative construction. When documentary subjects experience public fallout, legal petitions often become the primary mechanism to contest representation and alleged breaches of filming boundaries.
Broader Fallout Among Featured Individuals
The documentary’s reach extends beyond Sønstebø, affecting other individuals who appeared on screen. Hans Edvard Askjer was featured after visiting Nordhaug gård. In the aftermath, Askjer has stated that he is not a friend of Sønstebø and has taken distance from the series.
Similarly, residents from other locations featured in the broadcast have expressed dismay over their unexpected inclusion. Tone Bryn and her husband Øystein Berglund Alvstein, residents of Styrvoll gård, stated that they felt deceived after being filmed by documentarian Finn-Erik Rognan. The couple stated they permitted filming under strict conditions that individuals would not be recognizable and that cameras would be turned off by 20:00. Program editor Trygve Rønningen of TV 2 defended the production, stating that the agreement regarding filming hours was respected and that the network maintains that proper journalistic boundaries were observed.
Christian Sønstebø and partner submit legal petition against TV 2
What legal steps have Christian Sønstebø and his partner taken?
Christian Sønstebø and his partner Carine Smeby Schackt have submitted a legal petition against TV 2 to seek a judicial clarification regarding their portrayal in the documentary series.
Who actually owns Dalbo gård in Bærum?
Despite claims made in the documentary series that Sønstebø purchased Dalbo gård, the current owner confirmed the sale is false, and Bærum municipality’s agricultural chief verified that no application for the property has been received.
What specific substance claims were made regarding children in the documentary?
An anonymized individual in the series alleged that children received small mixtures containing psilocybin mushroom components, a practice characterized by psychiatrist Tor-Morten Kvam as entirely irresponsible and unsupported by pediatric research.
How will the upcoming court proceedings between the documentary participants and the broadcasting network influence the ongoing public debate surrounding media ethics and privacy in Norway?
Related reading