Born into slavery and forged in the fire of the 19th-century labor movement, Lucy Parsons became known as one of the most dangerous women in America. A recent discussion with Rattling the Bars host Mansa Musa and guest William C. Anderson honors Parsons, referred to as the “Goddess of Anarchy,” and traces her journey from former slave to militant activist.
A Radical Life
William C. Anderson described Lucy Parsons as a radical anarchist, a labor organizer, and an outspoken militant who was ahead of her time. She was a formerly enslaved Black woman who spoke with “unfettered, unrestrained radicalism.”
Parsons advocated for building socialism outside of the state, a core tenet of anarchism. Notably, she argued against voting even when she did not have the right to vote as a Black woman.
Historical Precedents
The discussion highlighted how the era in which Parsons lived set precedents for modern institutions. Anarchism, in the late 1800s and early 1900s, was seen as a threat to ruling classes internationally. Anarchists engaged in direct attacks and assassinations, leading to fears and eventually, the creation of infrastructure to respond to the perceived threat.
Following the assassination of President McKinley by an anarchist, President Theodore Roosevelt responded by creating what would become the FBI. This occurred during a period of repression targeting socialists, communists, and anarchists, and was not limited to anti-communism.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Lucy Parsons known for?
Lucy Parsons was known as a radical anarchist, a labor organizer, and an outspoken militant who was born into slavery.
What was the Haymarket affair?
The Haymarket affair was an incident in Chicago where seven anarchists were framed for a bombing.
What role did anarchism play in the creation of the FBI?
The assassination of President McKinley by an anarchist led to the creation of what would become the FBI as a response to the perceived anarchist threat.
Considering the historical context of Lucy Parsons’ activism, how might the challenges faced by radical movements today compare to those of the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
