Maryland Sheriffs Oppose ICE Restrictions & 287(g) Ban

by Chief Editor

Maryland sheriffs are voicing opposition to a pair of bills currently under consideration in the state Senate that would alter local law enforcement’s involvement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The debate comes shortly after Governor Wes Moore signed legislation banning 287(g) agreements – cooperative agreements between local law enforcement and ICE – on February 17.

Legislative Proposals Spark Controversy

Senate Bill 660 would require local law enforcement agencies to respond to ICE activity within their jurisdiction and submit a report. Senate Bill 791, conversely, would restrict local officers from notifying ICE when a person is in custody. Several sheriffs have publicly protested these measures, arguing they infringe on local autonomy and could hinder public safety.

Did You Know? Nine Maryland counties – Allegany, Carroll, Cecil, Frederick, Garrett, Harford, Washington, Wicomico, and St. Mary’s – participated in 287(g) agreements prior to the recent ban.

Worcester County Sheriff Matt Crisafulli stated that the proposed legislation is “extremely dangerous” and takes away the ability of sheriffs to cooperate with law enforcement partners. He emphasized that sheriffs are accountable to the residents they serve.

Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis argued that the new laws will not diminish ICE activity in Maryland communities. He stated that the legislation will instead “amp ICE up on the streets” and lead to increased enforcement efforts.

Concerns Raised Following Recent Murder Case

Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler recently held a press conference to express his disapproval of the ban on 287(g) agreements. He was joined by Patty Morin, whose daughter Rachel Morin was murdered in 2023. Victor Martinez Hernandez, an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador, was convicted of the murder.

Expert Insight: The opposition from sheriffs highlights a fundamental tension between local control and state-level immigration policy. The debate centers on the balance between assisting federal enforcement efforts and maintaining community trust, particularly among immigrant populations.

Sheriff Gahler explained that the 287(g) agreement in Harford County, which has been in place since 2016, allowed authorities to identify individuals who might otherwise pose a threat to public safety. Morin described 287(g) agreements as “a safeguard for our community.” The Maryland Sheriffs’ Association is now considering its options, including potential legal action.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 287(g) agreement?

A 287(g) agreement is a cooperative agreement between local law enforcement agencies and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that allows local officers to receive training and authority to enforce federal immigration laws.

What do Senate Bill 660 and Senate Bill 791 propose?

Senate Bill 660 would require local law enforcement to respond to and report on ICE activity. Senate Bill 791 would restrict local officers from notifying ICE when someone is in custody.

What is the position of the Maryland Sheriffs’ Association?

The Maryland Sheriffs’ Association is discussing its next steps regarding the new law banning 287(g) agreements, including exploring possible legal action.

As Maryland lawmakers continue to debate the role of local law enforcement in immigration enforcement, what impact will these decisions have on community safety and trust?

You may also like

Leave a Comment